This particular question is a bit challenging because it
            requires a bit of reading the "tea leaves" in order to fully answer the question.  I
            think that because of this, different people might have different responses to it.  For
            me, I don't think that the second half of the excerpt, albeit interesting, is something
            that is needed to answer the question.  I would rather focus on the first half for it
            helps to explain the basis of the question in terms of why or how bureaucrats came into
            being:
At one
time in history, bureaucracy actually meant fast, effective, and rational
administration. In its ideal form, a bureaucracy made sure that every job was carefully
designed to ensure faithful performance by well-trained, highly motivated bureaucrats,
or employees.
It is here
            where I immediately gravitate, and within this, I think that there is a valid
            description of "efficiency" in terms like "fast" and effective."  This now makes my 1
            out of 4 into a 1 out of 2.  With this down, I have a much more challenging element in
            figuring out if "predictability" or "accountability" is being described.  I feel that
            the descriptors used in the second sentence are telling.  The ideas of "faithful
            performance" and "highly motivated" and "well- trained" helps to bring out the idea of a
            service rendered whereby individuals can stand by the quality of their work.  For this,
            I like the idea of "accountability."  I don't see an element of "predictability"
            explained as much as I do, "accountability."  With this in mind, I would think that B)
            Efficiency and accountability is the correct answer.
No comments:
Post a Comment