There have not been many instances when competing ideas
            about American freedom presented itself.  One example would be at the Constitutional
            Convention.  Delegates were decidedly on two different planes regarding American
            freedom.  The delegates that favored a vision of freedom that emphasized the central
            government having power were called the Federalists.  They believed that freedom meant
            living in a setting where government could be seen to resolve problems as they arose and
            that freedom is not very effective when lawlessness and a lack of control results.  This
            is can be contrasted with the competing vision of freedom that presented itself at the
            Constitutional Convention in the form of the antifederalists.  These believers in
            freedom saw it as something that individuals needed to have in order to check the
            encroachment of the federal government.  In this particular context, the issue of
            competing ideas about American freedom were negotiated through the presence of the Bill
            of Rights in the new Constitution.
Another, more dour
            instance, where competing ideas about American freedom arose during the Civil War.  This
            time, the competing visions of American freedom held the North advocating one of two
            positions on freedom.  The first was that freedom can only be recognized in a coherent
            and unified nation.  Keeping the Union together was the critical element to a national
            expression of freedom.  The second, and more tangential articulation of freedom at the
            start of the war, was the idea that American freedom should apply to all of its
            citizens, and in this was the abolition of slavery.  The Northern position of freedom
            was contrasted with the Southern vision of freedom in which slavery was seen as an
            extension of one's own traditions and expressions, with which federal government should
            not interfere.  Slavery was seen as a tradition, something that Southerners did and its
            presence represented an expression of freedom that did not need to be interfered with
            from the North.  Compromises on both competing issues of freedom failed and the result
            was that there was an attempt to break America into two nations, setting the stage for
            the Civil War. In both of these, we see that different approaches can be taken when
            there are competing ideas about American freedom evident.
No comments:
Post a Comment