Tuesday, August 14, 2012

Discuss Marvell's poem "To His Coy Mistress" as an example of metaphysical poetry.

The term “metaphysical poetry” is not a term ever used by
Andrew Marvell to discuss his own poems.  In fact, none of the poets often called
“metaphysical poets” ever classified themselves as such. That term was invented by later
commentators to describe (often disparagingly) the style of such authors as Marvell and
John Donne.


Two brief, reliable treatments of
“metaphysical” poetry appear in The Cambridge Companion to Literature in
English
, edited by Ian Ousby (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1991) and in an essay by John D. Jump in Webster’s New World
Companion to English and American Literature
, edited by Arthur Pollard (New
York: Popular Library, 1976).  Here are some traits listed these books as typical of
metaphysical poetry, followed by discussion of the appearance of those traits in “To His
Coy Mistress.”


  • “strenuous
    argument”
    (Jump 457): Such argument appears throughout the poem as the
    obsessive male lover tries to convince a reluctant woman to have sex with him.
    Argumentation is especially apparent in such lines as the
    following:

readability="14">

Now let us sport us while we
may,


And now, like amorous birds of
prey,


Rather at once our time
devour


Than languish in his slow-chapped power.
(37-40)



  • “a
    dramatic and colloquial mode of utterance”
    (Jump 457): This poem is
    dramatic not only in the literal sense (since the speaker addresses another person) but
    also in the figurative sense, since his phrasing is sometimes startling (as in lines
    27-28).

  • “urgent feeling”
    (Jump 457): Again, the entire poem displays this trait, but it is especially apparent in
    lines 21-32.

  • “agile thought”
    (Jump 457): This trait is particularly obvious in the first stanza of the poem, in which
    the speaker quickly and easily shifts from one kind of imagined behavior to another.

  • “pun[s]” (Jump 457): The
    most famous example of a pun in this poem is the play on the word “quaint” in line 29,
    where the word can mean “old-fashioned” but can also refer to female
    genitalia.

  • “paradox[es]”
    (Jump 457): One example of a paradox is the speaker’s claim that he would love his lady
    “ten years before the Flood” (8) – obviously a temporal impossibility.

  • imagery drawn from “widely varied fields
    of knowledge”
    (Jump 457): in the course of the poem, the speaker refers
    to India, England, very early history, the end of history, classical myth, Biblical
    teachings, the behavior of animals, human sexuality, and various other “fields of
    knowledge.”

  • “serious wit”
    (Jump 457): The entire poem is witty in the sense that it displays the speaker’s
    cleverness, inventiveness, and skills at
    improvisation.

  • metaphysical
    “conceit[s]”
    (Jump 457): No conceit (or extended metaphorical comparison)
    appears in this poem in the way that one appears, for instance, in lines 25-36 of John
    Donne’s “A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning.” Nevertheless,Marvell’s ability to play at
    length with a single idea appears in lines 1-10 of his
    poem.

  • “unification of thought and feeling”
    (Ousby 615): The entire poem exhibits this trait, since the entire poem
    uses reason to promote
    passion.

  • “violation of
    decorum”
    (Ousby 615): It would be hard to think of a more blatant breach
    of expected, acceptable phrasing than lines
    25-30.

No comments:

Post a Comment

What is the meaning of the 4th stanza of Eliot's Preludes, especially the lines "I am moved by fancies...Infinitely suffering thing".

A century old this year, T.S. Eliot's Preludes raises the curtain on his great modernist masterpieces, The Love...