Sunday, June 30, 2013

f(x) = 1/(x^0.6) , 1

To calculate the area, we'll have to evaluate the improper
integral of the function f(x) = 1/(x^0.6) = 1/x^(6/10) =
1/x^(3/5)


y
`oo`


`int`
dx/x^(3/5) = lim     `int` dx/x^(3/5)


1                    
y->`oo` 1


We'll evaluate the definte integral using
Leibniz Newton
formula:


y


`int` dx/x^(3/5) =
F(y) - F(1)


1


We'll calculate
the indefinite integral of the function:


`int` x^(-3/5)dx =
x^(-3/5 + 1)/(-3/5 + 1) + c


`int` x^(-3/5)dx = 5x^(2/5)/2 +
c


F(y) - F(1) = 5y^(2/5)/2 -
5/2


Now, we'll evaluate the
limit:


lim [F(y) - F(1)] = lim F(y) - lim
F(1)


y->`oo` y->`oo`
y->`oo`


lim [F(y) - F(1)] = `oo` -
5/2


y->`oo`


lim [F(y) -
F(1)] =
`oo`


y->`oo`


Since
the limit is infinite, the integral is divergent and the area is not
finite.

In Animal Farm, what is the pigs’ major contribution to the Rebellion at the end of Chapter II?

Old Major dies, and under the leadership of the pigs, the
animals prepare for the Rebellion:


readability="7">

The Rebellion comes much sooner than anyone
thought, and the animals break free of Jones's tyranny and drive the humans from the
farm.



By the end of chapter
two of Animal Farm, the pigs had taught themselves to read and
write. The had used an "old spelling book which had belonged to Mr. Jones's children and
which had been thrown on the rubbish heap."


After learning
to read and write, the pigs had narrowed the principles of Animalism down to seven
commandments. They used paint to write the seven commandments on the wall of the big
barn. The original commandments
were:


  1. Whatever goes upon two
    legs is an enemy.

  2. Whatever goes upon four legs, or has
    wings, is a friend.

  3. No animal shall wear
    clothes.

  4. No animal shall sleep in a
    bed.

  5. No animal shall drink
    alcohol.

  6. No animal shall kill any other
    animal.

  7. All animals are
    equal.


The
animals began to study the commandments. The clever animals learned them right away. The
animals begin to live by the commandments. Since the pigs had learned to read and write
first, they contributed their learning to the Rebellion by creating a code for all the
animals to honor and obey.

Who were the Medici?

The Medici, or de Medici were a
powerful family in Florence Italy at the time of the Renaissance. They made their
fortune in the wool industry; but soon built a powerful banking empire, so powerful that
they were bankers for the Pope, and collected fees from all church
transactions.


The Medici, though powerful, had a keen sense
of community spirit, and believed that the family's honor was enhanced by contributing
to the arts. They were comfortable with their income and did not constantly crave more
and more. Among their contributions was to patronize such Renaissance artists as
Michelangelo, Botticelli, and Fillipi Lipo. A famous renaissance painting,
Venus Rising from the Sea was originally painted on the headboard
of Lorenzo de Medici. They Medici were thus of vital importance in the success of the
Italian Renaissance.


Aside from their business success and
patronage of the arts, the Medici were exceptionally powerful in political affairs. Two
members of the family became Pope: Leo X and Clement VII. Leo X was the last non priest
to become Pope, and reportedly said "God has given us the papacy, now let us enjoy it."
It was he who Martin Luther called the "Whore of Rome;" and who authorized the sale of
indulgences which led to Luther's issuance of his ninety five theses, thus precipitating
the Lutheran Reformation.  It was Clement VII who refused to annul Henry VIII's marriage
to Catherine of Aragon, and thus precipitated the English Reformation. Another Medici,
Catherine, became the husband of Henry II of France, and later regent for Charles IX and
Henry III. Thus the influence of the Medici on history cannot be
underestimated.

Saturday, June 29, 2013

Finny says that if u love something it has to love u back. Gene realizes it isn't true, & decides to give it a chance. What is the significance of...

After Finny's comment, Gene doesn't really "decide to give
it a chance" at all at that point.  Gene acquiesces and simply allows Finny to believe
that he agrees.  This is yet another facet of Gene's betrayal, the lack of true
connection, of honesty in communication between the two of
them. 


Gene hears and evaluates Finny's comment about love,
but decides that Finny is persisting in his fantasy world.  Gene admits that "in his
seventeen years of life"  that idea of loving something and it loving you back "in
whatever way it has to love" as Finny states, is simply not
true. 


But rather than engage Finny in an honest and
open conversation on this topic, he apathetically dismisses Finny's statement as "every
other thought and belief of Finny's", as something that "ought to be true."  This shows
an element of direspect from Gene.

What time period does the book Freak the Mighty take place?Explain how you know.

I would have to define the time period for the novel Freak
the Mighty as taking place sometime between 1980 and 1993. The way that I came up with
these dates in that the book was published in 1993 and I can see the cultural ideals of
that time period being shown in the novel.


The novel does
not include any reference to any specific historical happening. Freak makes reference to
mythology and science-fiction, but it is not specific enough to set an absolute
time.


My thoughts on why an author does not set a specific
time period is that they risk the chance that a reader may not be able to relate to a
novel if it takes place years prior to their existence. By not naming the time period,
the author is able to let the action of the novel speak to the reader. Also, the action
of the story is one which can be seen happening anywhere at, basically, anytime. It
allows the novel to remain relevant throughout time.

How many total pages are in "The House on Mango Street" paper back?

The total number of pages depends upon the edition and
publisher that you are interested in.


Here is the page
counts for the different paperback publishings for the novel "The House on Mango
Street".


The first edition of the novel was published by
Arte Publico Press in 1984. This edition contained 110
pages.


The reissue was completed by Knopf Doubleday
Publishing Group in 1984. The total number of pages in this edition is
144.


The second edition of the text was published by
Vintage Publishing in 1991 and the paperback contains 110 pages as
well.


Random House Publishing also published an edition in
1991 and this text contained 144 pages.


The newest edition
of the novel was published by Bloomsbury Publishing in 2004. The total number of pages
in this edition is 128.

How can I solve the following problem using a set of two algebraic equations?Mr Stein invested a total of $100,000 in two companies for a year....

There are two ways to do this type of question. One way is
to use one varible and use the information given to solve for the
equation


The other type, which is what you wanted, uses two
varibles.


Let X be the number of dollars invested in
Company A and Y represent the number of dollars in Company
B


Since the total investment is 100,000 dollars, we have
the equation


1.               
X+Y=100,000


There is another piece of information given,
which is that the total return rate is 8%, so that we have another
equation


money gained in Company A + money gained in
Company B= total money earned


Money earned in Company A is
X*13%=0.13X


Money earned in Company B = Y * (-3%)=-0.03Y
(since it was a loss, there should be a negative sign)


the
total money earned is : 100,000*8%=800000/100=8000
dollars


the equation is


2.    
0.13 X-0.03y=8000


rewriting the first equation, we
have:


X=100,000 - Y


substitute
that answer into the second equation, we
have:


0.13(100,000-Y)-0.03Y=8000


13000-0.16Y=8000


0.16Y=5000


Y=31250


then
x = 100000-31250=68750

How is "The Rape of the Lock" a contemporary satire?explain it in detail please... it is a 10 marks question... i need it very argent

Let's define what is exactly contemporary satire. This
genre belongs to a form of comedic literature whose purpose is to present a mocked
scenario as it if were serious. This is an aim to criticize and basically laugh about
serious topics that, in a contemporary satire, will be ridiculed and
belittled.


In "The Rape of the Lock", Pope criticizes the
aristocrats of his time with their ridiculous social rules and expectations by blowing
out of proportion an argument between two rich families over a stolen lock of hair. This
is what is known as the idiom "a tempest in a teacup", or the exaggerated rendition of a
petty situation.


Pope modeled the family feuds as an epic
battle almost identical to The Iliad, complete with a mirror
version of the abduction of Helen of Troy in the form of the rape of the lock.
Everything from excerpts of The Illiad are quoted, the names of
gods are used for characters, and the exaggeration of it all is what makes it a
satire.


If "The Rape of the Lock" were a traditional poem
the situations would not be satirized nor mocked, especially to the extent that
Alexander Pope uses it. The theme of love, beauty and courage are idealized in Pope's
age. Hence, what he did is like a "mockumentary" of one of those uber romantic and
emotional episodes to humor a population that craved a change of
pace.

Friday, June 28, 2013

In chapter one of Animal Farm, discuss the seating arrangements as the animals listen to Old Major's speech.

I think that the arrangement of the animals in listening
the Old Major is really important.  The pigs sit right in front, so that they can hear
everything.  It is also important to note that the pigs are hanging on Old Major's every
word.  In their placement in the front, as close as one can get to Old Major, it is
evident that the pigs see this as an opportunity to gain knowledge and insight into
something that is going to translate into power for them.  It is apparent that they
sense and know this.  Accordingly, their placement in the front is to reflect this
premonition, and a bit of foreshadowing on Orwell's part.  The fact that the three dogs,
Bluebell, Jessie, and Pincher sit in front of the pigs, almost escorting them is also
significant because it is going to reflect how the dogs are in protection of the pigs,
especially Napoleon.  This becomes painfully apparent in Chapter 7.  The dogs are
presented as almost escorts in how they lead the pigs, and will become the "muscle" of
the operation under Napoleon's rule.  The other animals' arrangement like the sheep,
cows, pigeons and hens are all peripheral in their arrangement in listening to Old
Major's message.  This is reflective of how they have a role in the farm to come, but it
is a tangential one.  Bringing in the back and demonstrating concern for the other,
smaller animals is Boxer and Clover.  This is reflective of how both cart- horses truly
believe in the animals' well being, something that is going to end up being manipulated
by those in the position of power as the novel progresses.

According to America, by Tindall and Shi, did the Jews fare better in the New World than the old?Chapter 2, in the book "America" by George Brown...

Jews were readily accepted in only one colony, South
Carolina. The Lord Proprietors of South Carolina had grandiose schemes of getting rich
quick from the sale of deer hides, Indian slaves, and later rice and indigo. They saw
the key to this prosperity as encouraging settlement to anyone regardless of religious
preference, thus Jews were welcomed into the State. The earliest Jewish congregation and
synagogue were established in Charleston, S.C.


Jews were
not welcome in other parts of the colonies, including Jamestown, where members were
expected to pay nominal service to the Anglican Church. In New England, no one except
those who subscribed to their Puritan beliefs were welcomed, they even hanged a group of
Quakers once who refused to leave. Obviously, non-believers were heartily NOT welcomed.
Anti-semitism was alive and well in Europe, so Jews there suffered from time to time;
but in the Americas, only in South Carolina were they allowed to emigrate at all until
the late nineteenth century.

What is the meaning of the 4th stanza of Eliot's Preludes, especially the lines "I am moved by fancies...Infinitely suffering thing".

A century old this year, T.S. Eliot's
Preludes raises the curtain on his great modernist masterpieces,
The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock, The Waste
Land
and The Hollow Men. In essence four poems rather
than one, Preludes can be described as vignettes which span a
single day, and which in their differentiated images reveal the contemptible,
soul-stunting conditions of modern life. These four fragments of a (failed) vision,
themselves point to the theme not only of the poem itself, but virtually all of Eliot's
early work: Western culture is a broken thing. Its human survivors live a rootless,
alienated existence in the modern city.  Only in the fourth vignette does the poet
glimpse a meaning beyond the futility and meaninglessness he
experiences:


I am moved by fancies that are
curled
Around these images, and cling:
The notion of some infinitely
gentle
Infinitely suffering thing.


At the close
of the day, as "the skies...fade behind a city block", and the streets darken, filled
with the sound of "tramping feet", the poet is left alone to reflect on another tedious
evening of "fingers stuffing pipes" and small-minded "certainties". Yet in a moment his
ennui is changed; he is moved by the inrushing epiphany of a transcendent perception.
For an instant he sees the 'inscape' behind these dreary images, a Christ-like
"infinitely suffering thing" that can save him.


But such a
'prelude' to a transfigured existence is laughable. With a coarse "wipe across your
mouth" the poet returns to his unbelieving way of life where world both visible and
invisible tediously "revolve like ancient women/Gathering fuel in vacant
lots".

In Schmidt's The Wednesday Wars, when does Holling start to read Shakespeare, and what pages is it on?

Holling's introduction to Shakespeare comes right after
the Great Chalk Dust Cream Puff Caper, in other words, right after Holling's inadvertent
destruction of three trays of newly baked cream puffs. Mrs. Baker was trying in vain to
find a productive use for Wednesday afternoons during which she and Holling's are
marooned together since half the classes goes to Catholic and the other half to Hebrew
lessons. Holling is the only Presbyterian and left in the care of Mrs.
Baker.


readability="10">

"Hoodhood," she said quietly. She thought for a
moment. Does your family attend Temple Beth-El?" she said. ... "Saint Adelbert's, then?"
She asked this kind of hopefully. ... "[On] Wednesday afternoon your attend neither
Hebrew School noe Catechism. ... You are here with me." ... Mrs Baker looked hard at me.
I think she rolled her
eyes.



One of her efforts at
occupying Wednesday afternoon came in the form of chalk eraser cleaning. This ill-fated
plan was unhappily inaugurated on the same day that Mrs. Bigio handed over dozens of
fresh cream puffs to Mrs. Baker for transport to the Wives of Vietnam Soldiers (WVS)
meeting. Chalk dust, liberated from the erasers, wafted up the levels of the school
building, lingered outside the one set of open windows--left open with a noble purpose
related to keeping cream puffs from getting soggy--then wafted in at the window and,
obeying gravity, settled decoratively across all the dozens of cream puffs. The women of
the WVS were unhappy with their cream puffs that
night.



The
cloud of dust had drifted in, and then gravity had taken over. The chalk had fallen
gently upon each of the cream
puffs.



Following this, Mrs.
Baker decides to take a different tack, one with less physicality and danger attached to
it: She and Holling will begin reading Shakespeare on Wednesday afternoons. This all
works out well for Holling as he discovers that Shakespeare is full of witches, murders,
drunkenness, wizards and spirits--who could resist?  You'll find where Mrs. Baker
unveils her great idea on pages 39 and 40 in the Sandpiper, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
2007 hardcover edition. You'll find where she pulls out two musty books from her desk
drawer, dusts them off, leaves the dusty musty smell behind, and hands one to Holling
while keeping the other for herself, commencing their Shakespearean readings together to
be sure Holling is "following the dialogue," on page 46.

What are the main settings, and how do they contribute to the conflicts in the novel, The Graveyard Book by Neil Gaiman?

In Neil Gaiman's The Graveyeard Book,
the primary setting of the story is the graveyard, where Bod ("Nobody") is raised after
the murder of his family, and his unexpected
escape.


Within the graveyard, there are places where Bod
should not go: for instance, he enters the world of the ghouls and has to be saved by
Miss Lupescu before the frightful creatures take his memory...and/or eat him. This
worries his protector at the time, and Miss Lupescu faces dangers of her own in saving
Bod.


When Bod visits the Indigo man, he meets an ancient
race called the Sleer, who are dedicated to protecting the treasures within for their
Master. While he goes where he should not, and the visit is at first fearsome, it will
later help him, as will his experience with the ghouls. (It causes a great
deal
of concern on the part of Scarlet's parents—she is Bod's friend; with
this incident the parents are sure Scarlet has been
kidnapped).


Falling from a tree into unconsecrated ground,
Bod meets a witch. While there is concern that she might be dangerous for Bod (on the
part of members of the graveyard community), Liza Hempstock ends up helping Bod several
times.


The most dangerous setting in the novel is outside
of the graveyard—this causes Bod the most immediate, long-standing threat. At one point
in order to make money, Bod tries to sell the Sleer's treasure. One man in a pawn shop
knows the murderer of Bod's family—a man trying to find a missing boy about Bod's age,
and almost captures Bod long enough to contact the murderer. While Bod escapes with
Liza's help, it is clear that someone is still trying to kill
him.


When Scarlet reappears and they go outside to visit
Mr. Frost—who seems to have news of Bod's family—Frost turns out to be "Jack," the
murderer who is trying to find him and "finish the job." By leaving the graveyard, Jack
knows Bod is alive, he and his "cohorts" follow Scarlet and Bod back to the graveyard,
and there is danger not only for Bod, but also for Scarlet who Jack also
threatens.


These are the major scenes within the novel,
each one bringing one kind of conflict with it or another.

Thursday, June 27, 2013

To what degree was Hitler's lack of skill as a military leadership responsible for Germany's defeat?As opposed to other factors like the strategic...

If, when you talk about "military leadership," you include
major strategic decisions such as when/whether to launch major attacks, Hitler's
mistakes were very important.  However, I would argue that they were less important than
his political mistakes.


Hitler's major military blunder was
his invasion of the USSR in June of 1941.  This was something that unnecessary and
overly aggressive.  It turned out, of course, to be one of the biggest mistakes of the
war and can certainly be seen as a major cause of Germany's
defeat.


However, the war was truly lost not simply by this
decision but by at least one other major mistake on Hitler's part.  This second huge
mistake of his was declaring war on the United States in the days after the Pearl Harbor
attack.  Hitler was not obligated to declare war on the US.  While he had been provoked
greatly by US actions, he had not previously declared war and had no need to do so
simply because Japan had chosen to attack the US.  There is nothing that guarantees that
US public opinion would have supported declaring war on Germany in a situation where
Germany had done nothing aggressive towards the US.


Thus,
Hitler's lack of military skill had a great deal to do with the loss of the war, but it
was not as important as political mistakes such as his opting to declare war on the
US.

In "Desiree's Baby," was Armand aware of his mother's ancestry?

A careful examination of the story conclusively reveals
that Armand was definitely not aware of his mother's ancestry. Note the way that when
Desiree becomes aware of the dark skin of her baby, she goes to her husband, horrified
and shocked, asking what the meaning of this is. The answer that Armand gives her
clearly displays Armand's belief in his own pure bloodline and condemns her and his
child for their racial impurity:


readability="7">

"It means," he answered lightly, "that the child
is not white; it means that you are not
white."



This harsh and cruel
response clearly places the blame of their child's questionable race on Desiree, as
Armand does not believe that he could ever be descended from any former slaves, as, we
are told, he belongs to "one of the oldest and proudest" families of Louisiana. The way
in which he treats his wife and child, after having been depicted as being so in love
with them, clearly displays his ignorance of his own ancestry, which of course makes the
ending of this excellent story bitterly ironic, as Armand realises that he blamed the
wrong person.

How does the author handle describing her characters in "The Lottery"?Multiple Choice (please choose): (a) they are only slightly developed; (b)...

(a) the characters of Shirley Jackson's "The Lottery" are
only slightly developed.  In fact, there are rather nebulous descriptions and, at times,
conflicting descriptions of the personages of her narrative.  For
instance, 


While the reader knows the most about Mr.
Summers, who has "time and energy to devote to civic activities," because he has no
children; he is in charge of the black box, and is, ironically, a jovial man who runs
the coal business in town and has a termagant for a wife. With the friendly unconcern of
a salesman, he waves and calls to the townspeople, "Little late today, folks." 
Portentously, the next character, Mr. Graves, carries the three-legged stool on which
the black box rests, much like a coffin. But, this is the only description. In addition,
there is really little known about the thoughts of many characters such Mrs. Delacroix. 
But, above all, Jackson's minimalist descriptions of characters keeps the reader in the
dark about what is to come, along with the neutral tones and words which the characters
use that could be about almost anything.

Why is Antigone a tragedy?

As with all tragic heroes, both Antigone and her uncle,
King Creon, suffer from a tragic flaw. stubborness; hers is stubborn self-righteousness
and his is stubborn pride, leading to Antigone's death as well as the deaths of Creon's
wife and son, Antigone's fiance. As classic tragic figures, they suffer misfortunes
brought on by themselves and from others in their story. Laws in society are important
in keeping people from living in chaos and not simply living and acting according to
their wills but a leader must not be so stubborn that he fails to act compassionately
when he needs to do so. Creon is such a leader; he rules absolutely and as a result,
abuses that power by destroying the moral, loyal, and couraeous people around him.
Antigone is moved by her loyaly to family and by her integrity. But, because Fate has
decreed the House of Thebes doomed since Antigone's father, Oedipus, the plot twists and
turns with misunderstandings and the conflict between religion and law, resulting in
these four characters' deaths. Unfortunately, this same Fate causes Creon to realize and
admit he is wrong too late to change this outcome.

What are the main similarities in the themes of A Farewell to Arms and "Barn Burning"?

While the backgrounds are different, there are a number of
thematic elements that, though different, have similar meaning because they overlap or
relate to each other. In Hemingway's A Farewell to Arms, war is a
dominant theme. In Faulkner's "Barn Burning" anger and hatred are dominant themes. While
war is on a large scale that involves governments and universal questions of moral right
and wrong, it is undeniably true that the individuals in the war face anger and hatred
and individualistic questions of moral right and wrong. Therefore, this is an instance
in which, though the themes are different, they overlap with similar thematic
elements.

Another different yet similar set of themes is patriotism
from Hemingway's story and loyalty and betrayal from Faulkner's story. Patriotism
involves loyalty and devotion to one's country; one is a traitor if one betrays one's
country. In Heminway's story, the blind loyalty of patriotism to a country's wars is
questioned by Frederick on moral grounds. In Faulkner's, Sarty renounces blind loyalty
to family on grounds that crime and violence are immoral, regardless of his father's
principle of for "mine and hisn both."


readability="13">

He did not knock, he burst in, sobbing for
breath, incapable for the moment of speech; he saw the astonished face of the Negro in
the linen jacket without knowing when the Negro had appeared.

"De
Spain!" he cried, panted. "Where's…" then he saw the white man too emerging from a white
door down the hall. "Barn!" he cried.
"Barn!"



In Hemingway's story,
identity and individualism are explored. In Faulkner's, Sarty's alienation and
loneliness are explored. Sarty is liberated from the loneliness and alienation that his
family impose upon him when he begins to find his own identity. Conversely, in
Hemingway's, Frederick loses his individualism when his identity becomes entangled with
Catherine's: "I want you so much I want to be you too."

Wednesday, June 26, 2013

Comment on the usage of proverbs in Chapter One of Things Fall Apart.

Proverbs are mentioned in relation to the conversation
that Okoye and Unoka have in the opening chapter of this tremendous novel. Achebe uses
them because, above all, he is trying to create an impression of this tribal society in
all of its beauty and mannerisms, and, as we can see if we read the novel, proverbs were
used extensively by this tribe to show the way that the art of conversation was so
important. Note what the text tells us about the use of proverbs for this
culture:


readability="11">

Having spoken plainly so far, Okoye said the
next half a dozen sentences in proversb. Among the Ibo the art of conversation is
regarded very highly, and proverbs are the palm-oil with which words are eaten. Okoye
was a great talker and he spoke for a long time, skirting round the subject and then
hitting it finally.



This
quote helps us to identify the importance of conversation in this culture and the way
that proverbs were considered to be akin to gem stones in a good piece of conversation.
Clearly Okoye uses proverbs to help "skirt round" the issue, avoiding direct
confrontation and openly demanding his money back from Unoka. Proverbs therefore are
something that the skilled communicator is able to use in this
society.

Combine the following pair of sentences into one sentence by subordinating information about one of the nouns or verbs.Igor Sikorsky was born in...

Think of subordinate information of information that is of
secondary importance in the sentence(s).  So your first step is to determine a hierarchy
of importance between the facts presented in the statements.  The part that is of least
importance should be surrounded by commas. 


The most
important thing about Skorsky is that he invented the helicopter because that is what
made him famous; therefore, the information about where and when he was born is the
subordinating information.  The sentences should be combined like
this:


Igor Sikorsky, who in 1885 was born in Kiev, Russia,
invented the helicopter.

In The House On Mango Street what is the lesson Esperanza must learn?

From the start of this incredible novel that contains so
many different experiences that chart the experiences of Esperanza and the other strange
assortment of characters that make up her barrio, Esperanza is clear that she wishes to
leave Mango Street and to have her own house one day. However, although this desire
remains unchanged, what this novel strongly suggests Esperanza needs to learn before she
can leave is that Mango Street represents her home and her community, and even if she
physically leaves this geographical location, you can never really abandon your roots.
Consider the way that this lesson is presented in the vignette entitled "The Three
Sisters." What is interesting about this chapter is that the sisters predict that
Esperanza is "special" and say that "she will go far," yet at the same time they teach
her an incredibly valuable lesson:


readability="8">

When you leave you must remember to come back for
the others. A circle, understand? You will always be Esperanza. You will always be Mango
Street. You can't erase what you know. You can't forget who you
are.



Esperanza thus is forced
to see that she cannot erase her roots. Mango Street is a part of her, and she has a
responsibility towards the women of her community who "cannot leave as easily" as she
can. Esperanza thus needs to learn the importance of community and what an indelible
part of us it actually is. Remaining true to your roots is a key concern of this novel,
as is the responsibility that Esperanza feels towards the various women of her community
who are trapped in unfulfilled lives that they cannot escape from in the same way that
Esperanza can.

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

a function f is defined by f(x) = 2/x + k. Given that f^2(2) = 2/3f(1), calculate the possible values of kThis is A composite functions question...

We'll solve this problem considering the given constraint
as it follows:


[f(2)]^2 =
(2/3)*f(1)


To calculate [f(2)]^2, w'ell have to calculate
first [f(x)]^2.


[f(x)]^2 = (2/x +
k)^2


We'll expand the
square:


[f(x)]^2 = (2/x)^2 + 4k/x +
k^2


We'll calculate
[f(2)]^2:


[f(2)]^2 = (2/2)^2 + 4k/2 +
k^2


[f(2)]^2 = 1 + 2k + k^2
(1)


(2/3)*f(1) = (2/3)*(2 + k)
(2)


We'll equate (1) and
(2):


1 + 2k + k^2 = (2/3)*(2 +
k)


We'll recognize that 1 + 2k + k^2 is a perfect
square;


1 + 2k + k^2 = (1 +
k)^2


Let (1+k)^2 = t^2 => k + 2 = t +
1


t^2 - 2t/3 - 2/3 = 0


3t^2 -
2t - 2 = 0


t1 = [2 + sqrt(4 +
24)]/6


t1 = (2+2sqrt7)/6


t1 =
(1+sqrt7)/3


t2 =
(1-sqrt7)/3


But k+ 1 = t1 => k = t1 - 1 => k1
= (-2+sqrt7)/3


But k+ 1 = t2 => k = t2 - 1 =>
k2 = (-2-sqrt7)/3


The possible values of k
are: {(-2-sqrt7)/3 ; (-2+sqrt7)/3}.

Can you share with me notes on the different literary ages/periods?

This is a very broad subject. Literary periods differ
greatly based upon different cultures. In order to narrow the topic, this answer will
include the most commonly referred to literary
periods.


British
Literature


449-1066 Anglo-Saxon- This period's
characteristics focused upon the trust in fate, the battle between emerging Christian
thought and embedded Pagan thought, and the importance of possessing values upheld by
the Anglo-Saxon society and culture.


1066-1485 Medieval
Period- This period's characteristics focused on morality and religion, chivalry, and
nobility.


1485-1660 Renaissance (Elizabethan and Jacobean)-
This period moved importance to how ones life is spent while alive (focus no longer on
after life), love, and human potential.


1660-1798
Neoclassical- This period focused upon reason and logic. Authors stressed the importance
of wisdom and harmony.


1798-1832 British Romantic- This
period focused upon the individual and not the societal. Nature is highlighted and
Gothic is introduced (stories of terror and
horror).


1832-1900 Victorian- This period highlighted the
conflict between the powerful and the poor, country life and city life, and lack of
sexual discretion.


1900+
Modern



American Literary
Periods


1650-1750 Puritan/Colonial- This period's works
were instructive. Many of the works were sermons and personal
narratives.


1750-1800 Age of Reason- This period was
designed to impact the thoughts of the American people through persuasive writing. Other
common texts were those of the political nature.


1800-1860
American Romantic- This period came about as a reaction to the Age of Reason. This
period focused upon the importance of imagination and
nature.


1840-1860 American Renaissance- This period focused
upon the "fact" that reality is grounded in ones spirituality and the existence of sin
and evil existing.


1855-1900 Realism-This period was meant
to change specific problems which existed in
society.


1900-1950 Modernism- This period highlighted the
quest for the American Dream and optimism.


1950-Present
Post-Modernism- This period broke down the boundaries made by previous periods in
regards to social class.


1970+ Contemporary- The
characteristics for this period are too hard to combine into one overall distinctive
definition.

What does purple refer to in Emily Dickinson's poem "Wait Till the Majesty of Death"?What does purple symbolize in this poem?

Emily Dickinson uses the color purple in many of her
poems. Regardless, the symbolism of the purple is not necessarily always the same. For
example, in her poem "We Like March" (see second link below), the color purple
represents the springtime.


In her poem "Wait Till the
Majesty of Death", the color purple represents something very different. For this poem's
reference to purple, "Full purple in his state", the color represents
royalty.


According to a color meaning
website,


readability="9">

Purple has been used to symbolize magic and
mystery, as well as royalty. Being the combination of red and blue, the warmest and
coolest colors, purple is believed to be the ideal
color.



Here, Dickinson is
referring to the royalty associated with the Majesty of Death. There are other
references to Death in which one could justify that Dickinson could be referring to the
Lord God given she raises the Majesty to the highest rank possible, "Lord of
Lords".


This assumption could be justified by looking at
the colors in which God commanded that Moses use the color purple to decorate the linens
in a tabernacle. The color purple not only represents royalty, but the highest royalty
if one adheres to Christian theology.

Solve for x the equation cos x-(tan x*cos x)=0, 0

cos(x) - tan(x)*cos(x) =
0


Making use of the fact that tan(x) =
sin(x)/cos(x), we have:


cos(x) -
[sin(x)/cos(x)]/cos(x) = 0


cos(x) - sin(x) =
0


Moving sin(x) to the other side, we can see
that:


cos(x) =
sin(x)


Now ask yourself, where on the unit
circle is cos(x) =
sin(x)?


This occurs only at
pi/4 and 5pi/4.


Note that at pi/2
and 3pi/2, the tan is
undefined.


Therefore, the solution
set is:  {pi/4, 5pi/4}.

What is the sum of the geometric sequence 4,12,36,...if there are 9 terms?

You can see that


sequence is
increasing by multiplying a number by 3. For example multiplying first number "4" by "3"
will give you 12, then 12 times 3 will give you 36 and so on. Doing that will give you
this
sequence


4,12,36,108,324,972,2916,8748,26244


When
you sum them up you will get 39364

What lesson does Buddy's friend learn about God and nature at the end of "A Christmas Memory"?

This part of the story occurs towards the end, just after
Buddy and his friend have sent all of their fruitcakes off and are flying their kites in
the sky. It is whilst they are both enjoying this idyllic moment, as their kites fly
around in the sky and "swim in the wind," that Buddy's friend suddenly has a kind of
epiphany about how we can see God. She had imagined that the human body needed to be
sick and dying before they were able to see God. However, the beauty of the current
scene and of the nature that surrounds them makes her realise that we don't see God only
at the end of our lives, but we realise that He has revealed himself to us throughout
our lives:


readability="10">

"But I'll wager it never happens. I'll wager at
the very end a body realises the Lord has already shown Himself. That things as they
are"--her hand circles in a gesture that gathers clouds and kites and grass and Queenie
pawing earth over her bone--"just what they've always seen, was seeing Him. As for me, I
could leave the world with today in my
eyes."



Buddy's friend
therefore realises that the divine is present in the everyday, if we have eyes to see
it, and that God reveals Himself in the beauty of nature. We do not therefore need to
wait until we are sick and dying to see Him, but can see Him everyday if we have eyes to
do so.

Where does it show in the book Penelopes loyalty to Odysseus and how does this help Odysseus in The Odyssey?I'm trying to show how penelopes...

Penelope's loyalty to Odysseus can be seen throughout the
epic poem. She remains a devoted wife to her husband. She is the epitome of a devoted
wife. Examples of this can be seen in her creative ways of putting off the many suitors
who've taken over her house in Ithaca. In Odysseus' absence, many suitors have taken
over her house wanting to marry her so they can inherit Odysseus' kingdom and all that
comes with it. Penelope wants nothing to do with them. She still lovers her husband and
believes he is alive and will return home. She tells the suitors that she is weaving a
shroud for Odysseus' dead father Laertes. She tell them that when she finishes the
shroud, she will marry one of them. However, what she weaves during the day, she
unweaves at night hoping to buy herself some time until Odysseus comes home. When the
suitors find out about her plan, she must come up with another one. She tells the
suitors that whichever one can string Odysseus' bow and shoot an arrow through 12
ax-helve sockets will win her hand in marriage. However, what the suitors do not know
that Penelope does know is that only Odysseus himself can accomplish this feat. Again,
she is hoping to buy herself some time until Odysseus can come home and reclaim his
kingdom.

In Fahrenheit 451, when Montag reads a poem to Mildred's friends, how does the original copyright date in 1953 have a connection to the women's...

Well, I have to say that I don't think the original
copyright date indicating the year of publication of this book doesn't have any direct
correlation with the comments that Mildred's friends make after hearing the poem that
Montag reads to them, as I think that the poem relates to all people of all times and
contexts. However, if you want a specific relation to the year of 1953, consider what
the USA and the world had recently emerged from in the form of World War II. It is hard
to overestimate the importance of this event. Even though the USA was only involved in
this war in the later years, vast numbers of soldiers were killed and died fighting in
this war, and the social, economic and psychological impact of this vital historical
event, much like aftershocks of an earthquake, continued to be felt for many years
afterwards. Now, let us relate this scenario to the final lines of the poem, "Dover
Beach," by Matthew Arnold:


readability="10">

And we are here as on a darkling
plain


Swept with confused alarms of struggle and
flight,


Where ignorant armies clash by
night.



This is an excellent
choice of poem by Bradbury because it exposes the real state of humanity, and also would
have echoed the experience of war for so many people who either were involved first hand
or were sat at home dreading the arrival of a telegram that would announce the death of
a son.

What is the genre of the book Homeless Bird?

I think that Whelan's work can classify as historical
fiction.  It is a story of what many girls in India have to endure, and while it might
not be specific about one person, it focuses on a historical and social condition.  It
is here where the work makes the strongest statement about a social condition in India,
and for this, it operates quite well as historical fiction.  Additionally, I think that
the realistic details of life in India are conveyed through a fictional character.  Koly
might not be necessarily real.  However, the conditions and situations that she faces,
the fact that she goes to Vrindavan and finds hope, and the idea that her life takes
different turns in different parts of India are all real events and accurate.  Another
representation here could be the genre of young adult fiction.  Koly proves to be a
protagonist that could be appealing to young people, particularly girls, as she speaks
for a condition of being young, something that is not openly accepted in India.  In
this, her story can also operate as a bildungsroman, an essential ingredient in Young
Adult Literature.

What type of relationship is the most beneficial to both of the organisms involved?A) Commensalism B) Mutualism C) Parasitism D) Symbiosis

B) Mutualism


Symbiosis is a
close relationship between organisms of different species in which
ONE or BOTH the organisms
benefit. Symbiotic relationship has three types: Parasitism, Mutualism and
Commensalism


Parasitism is a kind of relationship in which
one species benefits while the other is harmed.  On the other hand,
MUTUALISM, is the type of relationship in which BOTH
organisms benefit. An example of this is the pollination of flowers by bees. As bees get
nectar they also help the flowers pollinate. Lastly, commensalism is the relationship in
which one organism benefits and the other organism is neither helped nor
harm.

Analyse William Shakesphere's Hamlet as a revenge play.

William Shakespeare's Hamlet is one
literature's finest examples of a revenge play and is often considered the greatest play
written in the English language. The steps of revenge taken are of a terrible political
nature--the killing of a king--and the chain of events that unfold include the deaths of
many innocent characters. When Hamlet is visited by his father's
ghost, the ghost convinces Hamlet to enact revenge upon his father's murderer, now King
Claudius, who has also married Hamlet's mother. Although the act of murdering a king is
a monstrous one, Hamlet reasons that Claudius is deserving, but he fails in his first
attempt, finding Claudius praying: His death at such a moment may send him to heaven,
rather than damning him to hell. Hamlet's next attempt fails miserably, when he kills
Polonius, thinking he is the king.


Claudius, in an act of
deceit, seeks his own revenge by sending his stepson to the supposed safety of England;
however, he has given orders that Hamlet be killed instead. Meanwhile, Hamlet's beloved
Ophelia has gone mad and drowned herself. Laertes and Gertrude also die accidentally
from poison before the dying Hamlet finally enacts his revenge by forcing poison down
the throat of Claudius.


Shakespeare uses many examples of
revenge tragedy elements found in prior works, including madness, ghosts, personal
injustice, and bloody deaths. The corruption of the act--of killing a king--only
underscores Marcellus' famous remark that "Something is rotten in the state of Denmark."
Good eventually triumphs over evil, but Shakespeare's unique approach includes a hero
who must die in order to receive a final justice.

When does Clavert's in The Hour of the Wolf take place?

When a
story takes place is part of its
setting, along
with where it takes place. Some
stories may take place, be set, in a time period
before they were actually written for historical period pieces,
after they are actually written for futuristic or science fiction
stories, or during the same period of time in which they are
written. Clavert's The Hour of Dog falls into this third
category.


Clavert's story was published in 1980, and the
setting is contemporaneous to the period during which it was written and published.
Therefore, the story takes place just prior to 1980. There is an Iditarod Trail dog-sled
race from Anchorage to Nome in Alaska every year in the early spring (the date for the
2012 Iditarod is March 3, 2012). So the story, published in 1980, is set in the late
1970s.

What does Simon symbolize in Lord Of The Flies?

Simon symbolizes goodness. He is a gentle-hearted person.
He takes the time to feed the littluns. He symbolizes the Christ figure in his goodness.
The small children cannot reach the fruit as well as Simon. Simon takes the time to pick
the fruit for the littluns:


readability="5">

He kindly helps the younger boys get
fruit.



Simon also is
supportive of Ralph. He helps Ralph build the shelters when many of the boys would not
contribute their time. Also, Simon meditates. He has his own special place on the island
where he spends much of his time alone, meditating. He is intuitive by nature. He is the
first to realize that the beast is a dead parachutist hanging from a tree. He also
realizes that the beast is within man. Earlier, he tried to convey that to the boys but
no would listen to him. He represents a Christ-like image in which no one will listen as
he tries to share his goodness:


readability="6">

Simon tries to suggest that the only beast on the
island is in themselves; however, no one
listens.



Later, he has an
encounter with the pig's head and realizes that the beast lives within the
boys:



The most
intuitive of all, he is the first to realize through a vision that the beast is “human
at once heroic and
sick.”



Rushing to share what
he has learned with the boys, he comes out of the forest to meet a angry mob of boys
caught up in a hunting dance frenzy. The boys attack Simon and kill him with their bare
hands and teeth:


readability="8">

At the height of the party, a storm breaks and
Simon arrives to tell them that there is no beast. In a frenzy, they kill
Simon.



Simon's death is as a
sacrificial death, much like the Christ-like scene before the actual Crucifixion. Simon
represents a Christ-like figure. He is a picture of gentle goodness. He is reflective
and intuitive. He dies an awful death and his body returns to the sea. His death makes
Ralph more aware of the dangers that exist within Jack and his hunters. His death opens
Ralph's eyes.

Monday, June 24, 2013

What is the relationship between teacher and learner?

As the school year starts, this is a really interesting
question.  I think that you will find many different reads as to what is the
relationship between teacher and learner.  The most foundational of this connection is
that there is a shared experience of learning that should happen within the classroom
setting.  This learning is academic, hopefully real world, and can be interpreted as the
reflection of self that the student possesses.  From this, different teachers can pivot
towards different ends.  Some teachers will see a very structured and hierarchical
relationship between teachers and learners, a structure in which the teacher is the font
of all knowledge and understanding and the student's function in the relationship is to
absorb what is given by the teacher.  Other teachers will argue that there is a
relationship between student and teacher that is motivated through the defense of what
is right or reasonable with evidence.  This need for an evidential base or meeting such
a burden helps to transform the relationship between student and teacher to be one of
research and the student and teacher are both competitive researchers to find "the
truth" or that which is highly defensible.  There are other teachers who view the
relationship between student and teacher as representative of the social or emotional
dynamic that must be nurtured.  This relationship is one where there is a sense of
personal mentoring evident in the process of teaching and learning.  While there are
others who feel that the teacher and student relationship is one of exploration, one in
which teachers encourage students to take risks and immerse themselves in the content or
in the process of learning to explore new dimensions to themselves and the world around
them.  In the last two descriptions, there is less of a hierarchical focus than in the
previous two.

Please give an explanation of the following lines from "My Last Duchess."That's my last duchess painted on the wall, Looking as if she were alive....

You have quoted the first few lines of the poem, which
makes it clear that this poem is an example of a dramatic monologue. Note the way in
which the speaker is addressing someone, but although he asks this person questions, he
does not wait for an answer, as is shown by the fifth line. The speaker quickly
continues his narrative and gives no opportunity for the hearer to
respond.


These first few lines then establish the setting.
From the description of the painting as being of "my last Duchess," we can infer that
the speaker is the Duke, and that he has had more than one wife. He also gives testament
to the incredible skill involved in the painting, that makes it look as if the dead
Duchess is actually alive. We are told that a monk painted her and that very few people
actually get to see this painting because a curtain covers it. The portrait of the
Duchess bears an "earnest glance." This beginning therefore raises more questions than
answers. Why is the Duke showing this portrait to his hearer, and who is his hearer?
Answering these questions will help you to unlock the meaning of this rather disturbing
poem.

What are Romeo's qualities in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet, and what quotes describe these qualities?

One thing we
know about Romeo is that he is a sincere
person
. We see his quality of sincerity in
the very first scene. First, we learn from his father that
Romeo is feeling genuinely, deeply, sincerely grieved over some
matter
. We know of his sincerity because he has been seen staying out all
night and also seen crying each morning at dawn while standing in a certain part of
town, under a certain grove of trees. Most likely, he stands all night long in the same
part of town where Rosaline lives, and the grove of trees offers a view of her house,
possibly his bedroom. His tears show us just how deeply and sincerely he has let
Rosaline's rejection affect him. Romeo's emotional state is appearing to be so sincerely
troubled that Lord Montague is afraid Romeo will do himself some harm if he keeps
rejecting counsel, as we see in Lord Montague's lines addressed to Benvolio, "Black and
portentous must this humour prove / Unless good counsel may the cause remove"
(I.i.137-38).

Romeo's sincerity also
shows when he first enters the scene and is sincerely troubled, even
frustrated and angered
by the signs that there had been
another fight. He even rightly points out that the feud has
just as much to do with the two families' own love for themselves and their own ideals
as it has to do with the hatred each family feels for the other, as we see in his
lines:



O me!
What fray was here?
Yet tell me not, for I have heard it all.
Here's
much to do with hate, but more with love.
(171-73)



Another
one of his qualities
is that he is generally virtuous, even
pious
. Even Lord Capulet speaks of Romeo's reputation for being virtuous
when he commands Tybalt not to fight Romeo at the ball, saying, "Verona brags of him /
To be a virtuous and well-govern'd youth" (I.v.70-71). We especially see Romeo's
virtuous and pious mind when we see him feeling such deep regret and
remorse
in the final scene over killing both Tybalt and
Paris
. He shows feelings of regret over killing Paris when he says to his
corpse, "O, give me thy hand ... I'll bury thee in a triumphant grave" (V.iii.81-83).
Shaking hands is a sign of forgiveness and mutual respect. Therefore, by asking the dead
Paris for his hand, he is asking him for his forgiveness. He even asks the dead Tybalt
for his forgiveness, again showing us Romeo's virtuous and pious
mind.

What are the main features of Okonkwo's view of masculinity, and how does his view relate to that of other important characters in the novel?

Okonkwo views hard work as a masculine trait. He works
hard and insists that all those around him have the same work ethic. In fact, he beats
his wives and children to keep them in line. His oldest son Nwoye seems to have traits
like his grandfather, Unoka. Unoka, Okonkwo's father, was lazy. He did not work. He sat
around playing his flute and drinking palm wine. He borrowed money and owed money to
many different tribesmen.


Okonkwo detested his father. He
despised his laziness. Okonkwo became so hard because of his father's laziness. Okonkwo
feared that he would be useless as his father:


readability="9">

While Okonkwo's appearance portrays a man people
fear, it belies the terror Okonkwo hides within himself. For his entire life, Okonkwo
has had to deal with having a father who is considered weak and lazy—"agabala" in the
tribe's terms.



That is why he
works so hard. Working hard and beating his wives and children makes Okonkwo feel
masculine. He rarely rested. He disliked the Week of Peace because it was against
tradition to work that week. Not working made Okonkwo
uncomfortable.


Okonkwo was a brave warrior as well. He had
five skulls hanging from his belt. This act caused Okonkwo to feel masculine. He drank
palm wine out of a human skull from someone he killed in war. Also, Okonkwo was
considered a great leader. He participated in governmental affairs. This is another
masculine trait of which Okonkwo was proud.


Okonkwo is
tough. He is masculine in his rough exterior. He despises gentleness and
idleness:


readability="14">

Thus, he despises gentleness, idleness, and
demonstrations of sensitivity. He will not allow himself to show love, to enjoy the
fruits of hard work, or to demonstrate concern for others, nor can he tolerate these in
other men. He rules his family unit with an iron fist and expects everyone to act on his
commands.



Sadly, Okonkwo
could not get his clan to go to war against the white man who had come into the village.
For this reason he hung himself. Although Okonkwo considered himself masculine, he died
without honor. He had all the masculine traits, but he died without a proper burial
because he hung himself. After achieving great things in his life, he died without a
honorable burial. All of his masculine traits could not help him in
death.

Sunday, June 23, 2013

What are 10 major events in Speak by Laurie Halse Anderson, from the beginning until the end of the book in order?

In questions such as these, I think that the individual
has to end up determining what moments they see as significant.  Naturally, there are
some basic elements that would be seen as universal, but the idea of constructing "ten"
important events is one where nearly anything can be seen as essential.  The development
of characters, the introduction of side characters, as well as the growth of emotional
dynamics are all aspects which can become seen as "important" events.  For example, the
rape of Melinda has to be seen as an important event.  It sets the entire work in
motion.  Yet, from this many other elements can be developed.  Some might or might not
see Melinda's befriending of Mr. Freeman as an important element.  The shunning of
Melinda could be seen by different individuals as an important event.  The future of
"it" might be seen as another important event.  Perhaps, this could be seen as another
important event.  I think that Melinda's embrace of art and artistic expression is
another instant where an important event is evident because it provides an outlet for
her ability to "speak," the very basis of the novel.  I think that starting from one
point and then constructing different elements that you think are important can help you
find the ten events that are being sought.

When Ree's dad skipped bail, did she ever find him?

Ree's quest to find her father before she loses their
house and land to the state.  He has put their timber, house and land up as collateral
for his bail bondsman to bail him out of jail, and then no one has seen him since. 
Whether he is dead or alive, Ree needs to find him so that she can keep what little her
and her siblings and mentally ill mother still
have.


Towards the end of the story, Ree's enemies take her
to find her father's body, dumped into an out of the way pond tied to a tire rim.  In
the novel's grisly conclusion, Ree has to hold up her father's arms so that her
enemies--the wives of other meth dealers who killed Ree's father--can chain saw off her
father's hands, horrible proof to the police that her father is indeed dead.  This is
the disturbing conclusion to the story.

In Animal Farm, how does the non-human character of Boxer reveal some aspect of human nature?

Boxer's animalistic ability to work reflects a human
characteristic of loyalty.  Simply put, Boxer's strength is purely animal.  It is one
where it is singular in focus, driven by the need to work and work for the benefit of
the farm.  Boxer is not conscious of the work he does in terms of seeking benefit from
it or desiring an exterior end from it.  Rather, he understands work as his purpose and
to this end he does it with an intense fervor.  Orwell makes it clear that this
attribute of his is something that is animal in design, as there is no human sensibility
in this.  Such a non- human trait reflects an aspect of human nature in its blind
loyalty.  Boxer's loyalty is what makes him so recognizable to humans.  His intense work
ethic, such as asking the rooster to crow earlier so that he can work, or his mantras
such as "Napoleon is always right" or " I will work harder" is reflective of his human
character through non- human traits.  It is here where we see a human construct
demonstrated through non- human form.

Mercury has a higher boiling point (357°C) than water (100°C). Use the kinetic molecular theory to explain why.

There are main ideas of the kinetic molecular theory of
gases. First is that pressure of gases is an expression of an average force that
modifies the total momentum of molecules striking the wall. the second idea is that the
temperature of a gas is an expression of the average kinetic energy of its
molecules.


This second idea can be applied also for
liquids:


`C*T =(m*v^2)/2`  where `C` is a constant 
(1)


When liquids boil the velocity of liquid's molecules
overcome the interaction intermolecular forces and thus the molecules break free into
the gas state. Assuming that both in water and in liquid mercury the strength of these
intermolecular forces is about the same, one can deduce that about the same average
velocity of their molecules will be needed at the boiling
point:


`v_("H2O") =v_("Hg")`


But since the mass of one H20 molecule is 2+16 =18 amu
(atomic mass units) and the atomic mass of Hg is 200 amu, this implies that the average
kinetic energy of water is less than the average kinetic energy of
mercury.


`m_("H2O")<m_("Hg") rArr
(m_("H2O")v_("H2O")^2)/2 < (m_("Hg")v_("Hg")^2)/2`


From this observation and (1) one can imply that at the
boiling point:


`T_(H2O) < T_(Hg)`

In John Steinbeck's novel The Grapes of Wrath, who is Jim Rawley and what is the primary source of his strength?

In Chapter Twenty-One of John Steinbeck’s novel
The Grapes of Wrath, Jim Rawley is the manager of a federal relief
camp set up to help travelers during the Great Depression. The Joad family stop at the
camp on their trip west, and Rawley comes to greet them the next morning and see if they
have any unmet needs.


During the course of his discussion
with Ma Joad, Rawley reveals a number of strengths, both as a person and as a literary
character.  Rawley’s strengths as a person include the
following:


  • He is courteous, as when he greets
    Ma.

  • He is respectful, as when he addresses Ma as “Mrs.
    Joad.”

  • He is thoughtful and concerned, as when he asks Ma
    if the Joads have everything they need.

  • He appreciates
    beauty and a sense of community, as when he praises the singing of the women who worked
    together while washing.

  • He is modest, as when he denies
    being the “boss” of the camp.

  • He is generous in his
    praise, as when he extols the hard work of the camp’s
    inhabitants:

readability="7">

They keep the camp clean, they keep order, they
do everything. I never saw such
people.



  • He is
    subtly aware of the needs of others, as when he asks Ma for a cup of coffee so that she
    can show him her own courtesy and demonstrate her own kindness toward
    others.

  • He is accommodating, as when claims that he
    always drinks his coffee without sugar. (Ma has no sugar and is
    apologetic.)

  • He is attentive and available, as when he
    tells Ma (but not in a boastful way) that he is in his office all the
    time.

  • In short, the source of Jim Rawley’s general
    strength is his concern for others.

As a
literary character, Rawley is strong for some additional reasons, including the
following:


  • He is
    plain-spoken.

  • He seems to be the kind of “boss” or
    neighbor whom almost anyone would like to have.

  • He is an
    effective foil to some of the other, less attractive characters Steinbeck has
    presented.

If Rawley has any flaw as a literary
character, it may be, perhaps, that he seems almost too good to be true. He is obviously
a character designed to illustrate various virtues, and he is so entirely virtuous that
he runs the risk of seem stereotypical and lacking in full human complexity. He runs the
risk of seeming a stick figure, a plastic saint. Fortunately, his appearance in the
novel is brief. Otherwise he might seem too saccharine a figure – too
“sugary.”

Discuss the reasons for the failure of the freeburgher system introduced at the cape in 1657.

It is perhaps a misnomer to speak of the "failure" of the
Free burgher system, as it was for many years quite successful. The Free burghers were
Dutch immigrants to South Africa who at first were restricted to supplying food and
supplies to ships from the Dutch East India Company, also known as the VOC or
Vereenigde Oostindische Compagnie. The company at first prohibited
interaction with the native peoples of the area known as the Khoi khoi. A shortage of
supplies, etc. caused this restriction to be lifted and free burghers (as those released
from the restriction were called) soon established a thriving agricultural business
which was in part based on the enslavement of the local people. Strict Dutch Calvinists,
the free burghers interpreted their success as a sign that God had approved of and
blessed their occupation of the territory.


Their occupation
of the territory lasted until the Napoleonic Wars (1799-1815 at which time Great Britain
took control of the Cape of South Africa. The Free burghers, now known as
Afrikaners(Africans) or Boers (farmers,) resented British rule, particularly the
abolition of slavery in 1833. They then began moving inland in the Great Trek. Those who
participated were known as voortrekkers, (Dutch for "pioneers.") They easily overcame
native people with the aid of firearms which again they interpreted as a sign of God's
favor toward them. They established a number of free republics which flourished until
the discovery of gold and diamonds brought in more British. The end result was the Boer
war, which culminated in 1902 with the establishment of the Union of South Africa, a
British colony. Thus the free burgher system was successful for almost 350
years.

Saturday, June 22, 2013

What was the major contribution of the railroads to the industrialization of the nation?

The boom in railroads contributed to the industrialization
of the nation in some very important ways.  It led to a huge increase in the demand for
steel and it allowed a host of industries to grow which relied on the railroads to get
their raw materials and their finished goods to and from their
factories.


As the railroads boomed, demand for steel
skyrocketed.  Steel was needed for tracks and for rolling stock.  This helped the steel
industry to grow, driving industrialization.  At the same time, the railroads allowed
other industries to grow.  Industries were now able to move huge quantities of raw
materials to factories just about anywhere in the country.  They could then move the
finished goods around the nation equally easily.


In these
ways, the railroads contributed in tremendous ways to the industrializtion of the
US.

What did Tom do to try to break his bargain with the devil? (Name FIVE things he did.)

Tom Walker entered into his contract with the devil
willingly. He was driven to do so by greed and an unscrupulous nature. He rarely
considered the thoughtlessness of his bargain until he began to grow old. As he faced
his own mortality, Irving writes that Tom Walker “thought with regret on the bargain he
had made with his black friend, and set his wits to work to cheat him out of the
conditions. He became, therefore, all of a sudden, a violent church goer.” This is the
first attempt to renounce his deal with the devil. He does not simply attend worship
services, however. He employs a second strategy:


 “He
prayed loudly and strenuously as if heaven were to be taken by force of lungs. Indeed,
one might always tell when he had sinned most during the week, by the clamour of his
Sunday devotion.” In this instance, he seems to believe that the force of his repentant
cries will be enough to erase the bargain that he has contracted with the
devil.


Tom Walker’s fears grow more intense and he shifts
his focus from his own pains to appear righteous to the sins of his
neighbors:


“ Tom was as rigid in religious, as in money
matters; he was a stern supervisor and censurer of his neighbours, and seemed to think
every sin entered up to their account became a credit on his own side of the page. He
even talked of the expediency of reviving the persecution of quakers and anabaptists. In
a word, Tom's zeal became as notorious as his riches.” Here, he hopes that by censoring
and condemning his neighbors for their sinful habits, he will gain salvation for
himself.


The fourth step he takes in securing a release for
himself is to superstitiously keep a bible on or near his person at all times. He hopes
that the presence of the Holy Scriptures will ward off any attack from the devil. To
protect himself, therefore, he kept a small bible in his pocket and another on his
desk:


“Still, in spite of all this strenuous attention to
forms, Tom had a lurking dread that the devil, after all, would have his due. That he
might not be taken unawares, therefore, it is said he always carried a small bible in
his coat pocket. He had also a great folio bible on his counting house desk, and would
frequently be found reading it when people called on
business;”


Finally, when the grim reaper approached Tom to
take his life as payment for his pledge, he ran. With all the energy he could muster,
Tom Walker attempted unsuccessfully to outrun death:


“Away
went Tom Walker, dashing down the streets; his white cap bobbing up and down; his
morning gown fluttering in the wind, and his steed striking fire out of the pavement at
every bound. When the clerks turned to look for the black man he had
disappeared.”

Why does Anne not deserve our sympathy in The Chrysalids?

I don't necessarily agree that Anne isn't undeserving of
our sympathy in this excellent novel. If we analyse Chapter Ten closely, we can see that
actually there are a number of excellent reasons why we should feel sorry for Anne and
her situation. Note how she justifies her decision to Michael and the
others:



I'm a
woman--I've a right to marry and have children. There are three of you and five of us.
Are you saying that two of us must never marry? Never have any lives or homes of our
own? If not, then two of us have got to marry norms. I'm in love with Alan, and I intend
to marry him.



Anne presents a
clear and cogent argument based on the facts and also her right to enjoy life as much as
she can. Based on this perspective, we can see that Anne certainly has a point. Why
should she be forced to live a life without marriage and having children just because
there are not enough telepaths around for her to marry? In addition, the way she hangs
herself also makes her a sympathetic figure, as she is forced to face the fact that she
is different, and that this difference is something that she cannot
escape.


However, what definitely does not gain her sympathy
is her act of cutting herself off from the other telepaths and betraying them to her
husband. In a sense, by cutting off all communication and pretending to be a normal
person, she is essentially betraying herself as well. The letter that she writes before
killing herself could have easily resulted in the torture and/or death of all of the
rest of the telepaths. Anne never had the right to put the rest of the group in danger,
and as much as we can understand her frustrations, this is definitely something that
makes her an unsympathetic character.

Friday, June 21, 2013

From a feminist point of view, what does it mean to be Jig in "Hills Like White Elephants"?

Jig is faced with a choice - have an abortion or keep a
baby conceived out of wedlock (even though the word abortion is never used, it is clear
that this is the crux of the situation. When this piece was published in 1927, women
were beginning to have "rights" but the right to an abortion was still not really one of
them. In fact, womwn had only been granted the right to vote a mere seven years earlier.
Abortions happened, of course, because an unmarried pregnant woman was subject to scorn.
But, they happened in silence, and they often ended in death or permanent damage to the
women who sought them.English law allowed abortions in the 1920's only when medically
needed to protect the mother. In America at the time, abortion was illegal. Yet the man
is clearly willing to violate the law to impose his will (to be rid of the baby) on the
body of the woman he "owns" by virture of his status as
boyfriend.


From a feminist perspective, the aspect of
choice is what matters the most in this piece. Does she control her own body? If so,
does she have a right to abort a child or, more to the point, to choose to carry that
child to term and raise that child with or without the man's involvement. The right for
a woman to own her own body is a common theme of feminist literature. Jog clearly is
torn, but the American boyfriend seems ti have made the decision for her. He is
responsible, at least in part, for the life growing inside of her, yet he wants to
decide for her that she will abort the baby. She does not, in society's eyes, own her
own life or the life of her baby.


Interestingly enough,
abortion was a theme that Hemingway was intrigued by. His six word short story says it
all :



For
sale: Baby shoes, never
worn



While this could mean
the baby died, it could also be a child lost to abortion. The woman must make a choice -
do as the man tells her to do (and keeping him happy and, presumably, with her in the
bargain) or do as she wants and keep the baby. The ability to choose, often taken away
from women during this time period, but less so than in prior decades, is a main
argument posed by feminist criticism.

What is graffiti?

When most people hear the word "graffiti," they think of
spray-painted tags or sometimes other images that are placed on public or pirvate
property such as the sides of buildings, trucks or trains, or really any place visible
to the public.


Technically, however, graffiti is any kind
of mark or image placed on property, and strangely enough it is usually on other
people's property!  But it can take the form of spray paint, it can be scratched into a
surface such as initials on a tree-trunk, or any other kind of
marking.


There are also widely differing opinions on the
artistic (or not) nature of graffiti and whether it ought to be more accepted or more
heavily prosecuted.

How does the setting of The Great Gatsby contribute to the theme of the novel?And are there any quotes that show this?

The themes of The Great Gatsby are
quintessentially American: dreams, money, power, morality, love, greed, and gender.  All
of these are connected to the geography of the novel and American
itself.


  • East Egg,
    (Port Washington, Long Island NY) where Tom and Daisy live, stands for the "East Coast,"
    the established rich, white collar, the early Puritan white settlers, the
    bourgeoisie who are, according to Nick careless, greedy,
    unfaithful, and immoral.

  • West
    Egg
    , (King's Point, Long Island NY) where Nick and Gatsby live,
    represents the "West Coast," the newly rich, where the "go West young man" settlers
    venture to stake out new bounds.  Though Gatsby is a criminal, Nick forgoes judgment and
    lives vicariously through Gatsby's American
    dream.

  • The Valley of Ashes,
    (Flushing Meadows, Queens NY) where George and Myrtle live, represent the "Middle West,"
    where the proletariat (working class, blue collar) live, full of dust and death.  This
    is where the American dream goes to die (it's where Gatsby's dream dies, when Daisy hits
    Myrtle).  The Eyes of T. J. Eckleburg haunt the place, reminding us of a God who
    abandoned.  What used to be idyllic and charming about the Midwest (in the Louisville
    flashbacks) is now dust.  Eventually, Nick will return to the Midwest (Minnesota), where
    he narrates the novel two years after Gatsby's
    death.

  • New York City, (158th
    St. Manhattan, NY) where Tom keeps his mistress Myrtle, is a sordid place full of
    brutality (Tom's slap of Myrtle), decay (Meyer Wolfsheim's human molar cufflinks),
    murder (Meyer Wolfsheim's story of Rosie Rosenthal's murder), and oppressiveness (the
    heat).

Wednesday, June 19, 2013

Who is Godot and who are the characters in Waiting for Godot?

As the dramatis personae at the beginning of the text
indicates, there are five characters seen on stage in Waiting for
Godot.

Vladimir and Estragon are two clowns (in the colloquial sense
of the word). They spend their days in idle banter waiting for a mysterious Godot -- who
neither man has ever actually met or seen, but whom both (at times) are convinced will
be arriving at the tree on the corner of a road where they currently
reside.

Midway through the first act, a loudmouthed slave-driver named
Pozzo arrives. Didi and Gogo mistakenly believe Pozzo to be Godot, but he soon assures
them in no uncertain terms that this is not the case. In the second act, Pozzo returns
and appears to have suffered a strange twist of fate.

Pozzo is flanked
by Lucky, an elderly bag-carrier who appears at first to be deaf-mute and almost
subhuman. Pozzo swears that Lucky taught him everything he knows, which confuses Didi
and Gogo, and Lucky later launches into a nonsensical monologue, which only serves to
further confuse the two travelers.

The final character who appears
onstage is "the boy," an apparent messenger from Godot himself. The boy brings news to
the men from the unseen Godot. Like Pozzo and Lucky, the boy appears once in each act of
the play.

Godot is never seen onstage. His identity remains largely a
mystery, both to the characters and to the audience. Some have suggested that the
etymology of the character's name indicates that he is, in fact, a "God"(ot) -- while
others have argued that the character is merely symbolic of an eternity spent waiting
for any unseen reward. From the characters perspective, Godot has sent for them (or so
they believe), and has promised to arrive at this predestined spot at this predestined
time (but again, they are increasingly unsure of the validity of this information as the
play unfolds).

Discuss the Songs of Innocence and of Experience as "Contrary states of the human soul."

Well, the simplest answer to this question is that the two
states of innocence and experience are captured in the two groups of poems, and the
difference between these two states is emphasised by the relationship between the
parallel poems. Innocence seems to be a condition that is very similar to being a child.
As poems like "The Lamb" and "The Chimney Sweeper" illustrate, this childlike state is
one in which the natural and human world is regarded without fear and where we are
secure and have a home. We can also equate the state of innocence in Blake's work to
that of being happy with our sexuality and with our bodies. The state of innocence in
this way deviates significantly from any biblical parallels with the Garden of
Eden.


The collection of poems, however, point towards the
way that innocence as a state is not eternal, although we can do our best to cling on to
it through beauty, poetry and love. As we move into adulthood with its accompanying
responsibilities, duties and cares, the state of experience supersedes the state of
innocence. However, Blake appears to make it clear that this progression is inexorable,
we as humans exacerbate this transition through all kinds of harshness and lack of
forgiveness politically, religiously and personally. Hence the famous phrase of the
"mind-forg'd manacles" that dominates "London." Blake thus points towards the way that
we enchain ourselves through our customs and traditions and through our own personal
outlook on life. Through this phrase Blake points towards the forces of violence at work
in society at large, but he also indicates that this is a process of internalisation as
we accept these forces without question and as facts of life.

Monday, June 17, 2013

Describe the main features of Early Renaissance art and architecture in style and subject matter.

The art and architecture of the early Renaissance
emphasized realism.  Artists wanted to faithfully depict human anatomy, emotion, and
expression in paintings and sculptures.  The architecture of the time emphasized
symmetry and featured arches, domes, columns, and sculptures that hearken back to the
temples of ancient Rome and Greece.   Both the art and architecture of the Early
Renaissance marked a return to the aesthetic values and styles of classicism.   It was
inspired by the philosophy called humanism, which focused on achieving human perfection
here on earth.  This was a dramatic change from the mentality and art of medieval times
where the focus was always on the wonders of heaven.  Early Renaissance subject matter
was still religious, but it was very much about showing the greatness of man and what he
could achieve.  It was a time of great development in terms of art theory and technique
as well.  Perspective theory was developed by Leon Battista Alberti and recorded in his
book Della pittura (On painting) in the early
renaissance.  This gave artists a system for accurately depicting three dimensional
space on a two dimensional surface.  Renaissance painters in Italy learned from this new
perspective theory and created works such as The School of Athens
by Raphael that showcased both their own artistic skill as well as the grandness of the
architecture of the time.

Friday, June 14, 2013

What is a business plan for a coffee shop?

Without lots more specific information, there are too many
variables to address this question. If you are trying to develop a business plan for a
coffee shop, some important starting points for your consideration would include:
1) Location and size of the shop, which would relate to the cost of renting the space
and equipping it with kitchen and facilities for customers; 2) Clientele, as the
customer base you hope to cultivate may influence business hours, decor, additional
items sold or services provided; 3) Sources and costs of supplies - are you planning to
serve only organically grown coffee, use (and wash, and store) ceramic plates and steel
cutlery as opposed to disposable; 4) Employees, which may be needed to cover hours open,
food preparation, cleaning the shop, and so on but need to be paid and provided with
insurance; 5) Advertising to attract business to the shop once it opens; and
more.

Thursday, June 13, 2013

How does the title fit into the overall themes of Les Misérables?

The title refers to the basic level of underclass and
disenfranchised that exists in France.  Hugo's title takes the French word and apply it
to the level of society that lacks power and a voice.  It is Hugo's hope that he is able
to bring a voice to the voiceless, power to the powerless, and the acknowledgement to
those who are invisible to the upper echelons of French society and to French
government.  The title helps to bring to light the suffering of a group of people. 
Their predicaments in living in the shadows of French life and how it feels to be
marginalized is the primary purpose of the work.  In the process, it is important to
understand that Hugo is deliberate in speaking the words of an entire group of people. 
The violation of human rights to this group of people, the "miserables," is in fact
"miserable."  It is something that need to be brought to the attention of the reader and
in the process it is one that is explicated thoroughly in the course of the narrative. 
The title is reflective of how those who are deemed as "miserable" have a narrative and
possess a story to tell.  In making this his title and focus, Hugo feels comfortable
enough to do so.

Monday, June 10, 2013

Why does Mr.Jaggers keep referring to Magwitch in New South Wales and Provis as one who will probably come to London to see Pip?Great Expectations...

Mr. Jaggers has been rather circumspect in Chapter XXXVI
when Pip has inquired about the name of his benefactor, telling Pip that is a question
that will "compromise" him, but when that benefactor comes to Pip, this occurrence will
mark the end of Jaggers's business with Pip. So, when Pip goes to Mr. Jaggers in Chapter
XL of Great Expectations in order to ascertain if, indeed, Magwitch
is his benefactor, Mr. Jaggers replies, "That is the man...--in New South
Wales," implying that Magwitch is in New South Wales, a territory to which convicts from
England were transported. 


Mr Jaggers explains to Pip that
he wrote to Magwitch in New South Wales that he has been expatriated for the rest of his
life and cannot return to England without "the extreme penalty of the law."  The lawyer
reiterates with each of his sentences that his communication with Magwitch has always
been sent to New South Wales.  Then, he tells Pip that he has received communication
from a man known as Provis, a colonist.


readability="6">

"Probably it is through Provis that you have
received the explanation of Magwitch--in New South
Wales"



By this time, Pip has
understood the innuendos made by Mr. Jaggers.  Since Magwitch's return to England would
constitute a grave felony, it would Mr. Jaggers's legal duty to report the presence of
Magwitch in London.  In order to protect himself, and Magwitch, as well, Jaggers
pretends to only know that Magwitch is in New South Wales, and Provis is a different
person.  Thus, when Pip begins to depart, Mr. Jaggers, ever the careful lawyer,
says,



...In
writing by post to Magwitch--in New South Wales--or in communicating with him through
Provis, have the goodness to mention that the particulars and vouchers of our long
account shall be sent to you, together with the balance; for there is still a balance
remaining.  Good day,
Pip!"



By mentioning New South
Wales every time he speaks, Jaggers has himself protected from any accusations that he
knows of Magwitch's presence in England; at the same time, he conveys his message for
Magwitch/aka/ Provis.

What is the meaning of the 4th stanza of Eliot&#39;s Preludes, especially the lines &quot;I am moved by fancies...Infinitely suffering thing&quot;.

A century old this year, T.S. Eliot's Preludes raises the curtain on his great modernist masterpieces, The Love...