Friday, February 28, 2014

Is the pytogorian triple a^2+b^2=c^2 unique? and Is there is any formula to generate the numbers which satisfy the equation...

No they are not unique.  The smallest
is


(63)^2 + (16)^2 =  65^2 = (33)^2 +
(56)^2


I have not been able to find a formula for
them.


If you do not have to have the sum a
square,


(8)^2 + (1)^2 = (7)^2 + (4)^2  (64 + 1 = 49 + 16)
and this gives the seeds for the above equation by using the formula for generating
pythagorean squares,
if n = 8, m = 1 you get 63^2 + 16^2 = 65^2,
and
if n = 7, m = 4 you get (33)^2 + (56)^2 =
65^2


Here are some others:


(2,
11), (5, 10)
(3, 14), (6, 13)
(2, 9), (6, 7)
(4, 17), (7,
16)
(1, 18), (6, 17), (10, 15)
(5, 20), (8, 19), (13,
16)
(3, 11), (7, 9)
(6, 23), (9, 22)
(4, 13), (8,
11)
(7, 26), (10, 25), (14, 23)
(3, 28), (8, 27)
(5, 15),
(9, 13)
(8, 29), (11, 28)
(2, 16), (8,
14)


These are pairs of m and n, so use the formula for
generating Pythagorean triples to get the actual
numbers.


(16^2-2^2)^2 + (2(2)(16))^2 =
(2^2+16^2)^2
(14^2-8^2)^2 + (2(8)(14))^2 = (14^2+8^2)^2
and
(2^2+16^2) = (14^2+8^2)


No they are not
unique.

How does Orwell give internal events (thoughts) the sense of exitement, suspense, and climax usually associated with external action in 1984.im not...

Orwell has to do this because of the
society he set up. There are not opportunities for characters to interact to the degree
that great excitement occurs because the Thought Police would interfere if there was
something tremendously exciting. People would be thinking if there was great
excitement.


This happens in several
ways:


1. WINSTON'S VIVID
IMAGINATION
: There are moments when Winston and Julia are engaging in
their relationship when we see Winston's thoughts more that the overt actions they
commit. In addition, in the beginning of Book 3, when Winston imagines someone coming to
bring him a razor blade, he even imagined the "sort of burning coldness" it would take
when the blade broke his skin. This oxymoron gives readers a vivid idea of taking one's
life. (Imagery)


2. ORWELL INCITES THE INNER
REBEL
in readers too. We are naturally inclined to side with Winston's
point of view because the story is told through his thoughts. Although it is in third
person, Winston is who the narrator follows. We only know of Winston's thoughts and are
therefore on his side. Watching the society from the outside, we know it is wrong. When
he doesn't really want to participate in Hate Week, or when he gets antsy thinking he is
being watched from his own telescreen, we do too. We don't like watching him being
watched and are drawn to relate to him. We wouldn't want to be in his position either.
(Point of view)


3. ORWELL SHIFTS OUR
EXPECTATIONS
. Readers are told that war is peace, ignorance is strength,
and that the Ministry of Love is a terrible place. These words all shift meaning for us.
We understood a different meaning for each of them than from what we see in this work.
This builds suspense because we wait to see how that is played out in front of us! This
comes full circle because in the last book we see how the transformed language coupled
with torture finally brainwashes Winston so he can love Big Brother and mean
it.

What is the theme of "The Way Up To Heaven"?

“The Way Up To Heaven” is a perfect-crime story. The main
theme is the commission of a perfect murder.


A
supplementary theme involves Mrs Foster's “pathological fear” of being late and her
husband’s passive aggression in deliberately making her anxious about being late. Mrs
Foster does not understand whether her husband is tormenting her
deliberately.


readability="13">

Mrs Foster was and always had been a good and
loving wife. For over thirty years, she had served him loyally and well. There was no
doubt about this. Even she, a very modest woman, was aware of it, and although she had
for years refused to let herself believe that Mr Foster would ever consciously torment
her, there had been times recently when she had caught herself beginning to
wonder.



So a another theme
might be called “The worm turns.”


Perfect crime stories are
a familiar genre. Edgar Allan Poe wrote several. Such stories can either end in success
or failure. Most often the protagonist plans a perfect murder but gets caught because of
overlooking one detail. Less often the murderer plans a perfect murder and gets away
with it. That is the case in Poe’s famous story “The Cask of Amontillado.” In Poe’s “The
Tell-Tale Heart” and “The Black Cat” the murderer does get
caught.


Roald Dahl’s “The Way Up To Heaven” strongly
resembles his “Lamb to the Slaughter,” in which Mary Maloney kills her husband with a
frozen leg of lamb and then destroys the murder weapon by cooking it and serving it to
the policemen who are investigating the crime. In both stories the perpetrators are
sweet, domestic, docile women who kill their husbands in a momentary flare-up of
passion.


In “The Way Up To Heaven,” Mrs Foster finally
discovers positive evidence that her husband has been deliberately tormenting her all
these years, and she takes her revenge by letting him get stuck between floors on the
elevator for six weeks while their house is vacant and completely unattended. Both women
get away with their crimes because no one would suspect such devoted and submissive
wives to murder their husbands and also because there is no way of proving murderous
intent.


So the main theme of “The Way Up To Heaven” is the
successful commission of a perfect crime, and supplementary themes are passive
aggression, “the worm turns,” and "the biter bit."


In a
story including "the biter bit," the aggressor is appropriately punished by being
caught, so to speak, in his own trap. Mr Foster would not have gotten stuck in the
elevator if he had not been pretending that he had to delay their departure in order to
go back upstairs to look for a gift he wanted his wife to take to their daughter in
Paris.



At
this point, Mrs Foster suddenly spotted a corner of something white wedged down in the
crack of the seat on the side where her husband had been sitting. She reached over and
pulled out a small paper-wrapped box, and at the same time she couldn’t help noticing
that it was wedged down firm and deep, as though with the help of a pushing
hand.



Mr Foster’s trick costs
him his life. His wife finally realizes the subtle sadist has been deliberately
torturing her with his passive aggression for years, and thus she has the motive for
letting him perish in the stalled elevator. His going back up on the elevator provides
both the motive and the means for his own execution. This bit of irony is what makes the
story appealing.

How is Claudius and Gertrude's relationship in Hamlet destructive?

The relationship between Claudius and Gertrude is
destructive in two ways. First, they destroy the potential in their own relationship;
second, they destroy other people literally.


A quick
marriage after a woman is widowed may give rise to suspicions of previous adultery. If
true, deception is not necessarily the best foundation for a positive future
relationship. As their marriage flourishes, it appears that their life's work becomes
putting out the fires of the results of this marriage. Claudius regularly sends Gertrude
to try to speak to Hamlet on their behalf to discover what's wrong. It is in one of
these moments that an accidental destruction occurs when
Hamlet kills Polonius while talking to his mother. Hamlet thought he was killing a
listening Claudius. Now Gertrude and Claudius have to deal with this dead body and
covering up that mess. This weakens their relationship
further.


With Claudius as the killer of Gertrude's previous
husband, and such a close wedding after the death, every audience member jumps to the
conclusion of foul play. Viewers wonder if Gertrude had anything to do with it and they
(like Hamlet) wonder why more time isn't devoted to grieving. These two acts (the murder
and then the marriage) are acts which Claudius and Gertrude contribute to that begin a
destructive process in Prince Hamlet. These acts cause him
to believe the Ghost of his father and they spur him to try to avenge his
death.


Finally, their relationship is fully
destroyed when Claudius accidentally poisons his wife and
Hamlet intentionally kills Claudius.


The relationship
between Claudius and Gertrude is the inciting incident in this drama that ignites the
action of the tragedy that plays out on stage. Without their
destructive relationship, there would be no
play.

Thursday, February 27, 2014

What kind of evidence did Diamond rely on in Guns, Germs and Steel?

Over the course of the book, Diamond uses about every kind
of evidence you can think of.  He uses scientific evidence, linguistic evidence, and
historical evidence, among others.


For example, in the
early parts of the book, Diamond uses a great deal of scientific evidence.  He uses
things like evidence about the size of the seeds of prehistoric grasses.  He uses
evidence about the ways in which diseases evolve.  These are very scientific types of
evidence.


In other chapters, Diamond uses "softer" kinds of
evidence.  He uses linguistic evidence to make claims about how the Bantu came to
dominate Africa and about how Austronesians spread through the Pacific.  He uses
historical (and geographical) evidence to talk about the ways in which different kinds
of Polynesian societies evolved.


In these ways, Diamond
uses many kinds of evidence over the course of this book.

To what extent did the setting of place and time affect the main characters of Lord of the Flies?

When we first meet Jack, he is already a totalitarian
leader. He demands his choir stay in formation until Simon passes out. Later in the
novel, he rules through fear. He uses Roger as his enforcer, but Jack makes the rules
and demands they be followed. Because of this one could argue that Jack has not really
changed at all because of the setting. Jack was peeved when
Simon fainted at the beginning of their time on the island
and only allowed the choir to sit down because he realized he would face mutiny if he
did not. This giving in to what they wanted helped secure his position as leader, he
recognized by giving in the choir was thankful to him. He did not make this move out of
a humanitarian effort. Therefore it could be argued that he never showed humanity. If
you hold this belief, you could reasonably argue that Jack did not change at all because
of the setting.


On the other
hand, one could also argue that Jack did have humanity. One could argue he was not a
totalitarian leader at the beginning of the novel, before being stranded on the
island, but rather a little boy who was scared and trying
to keep some semblance of normalicy in a very abnormal situation. Keeping the choir in
line was his way of trying to control a world that was spinning out of control (with
both the war outside the
island, and the fear of being through a plane crash and
left without adult supervision). He showed humanity by letting the choir sit down when
they arrived with the other boys despite his opposite treatment of Simon, which was
obviously a common treatment thus also a semblance of normalicy. He also showed humanity
by his inability to kill the first pig.  If you take this second stance, then the
setting had a great impact on Jack. Being forced to live
without the routine that he clung so desperately to (as with the pig dance) caused Jack
to degenerate. At first, this was a slow change, but once it happened, it quickened
because of the effect of the
setting.

Narrate these linesOnly reapers, reaping early In among the bearded barley, Hear a song that echoes cheerly From the river winding clearly,...

One way to interpret poetry is to make sure you first
understand all the vocabulary. Poems written almost 200 years ago are bound to include
words we computer geeks with our techno-gadgets may not know. Lord Tennyson would have
no idea what an MP3 file is.


Reaping means to gather or
cut, like a crop. It also reminds me of the Grim Reaper so there could be some
foreshadowing happening.


Barley is a grain. Bearded barley
means it's ripe for picking. The phrase also shows deft use of alliteration and
personification.


Sheaves are bundles of barley that reapers
have gathered.


Tennyson uses an allusion to Camelot of the
early Middle Ages. King Arthur and his knights of the round table were known as
invincible warriors. Legend has it they were pretty hot
guys.


Here's a contemporary
translation:


Only the reapers (workers) picking fat barley
in the early morning


Hear a song that drifts down the river
toward towering Camelot.


After a long day of work, the
reaper piles the bundled grain on higher ground away from the
fields,


And listens for the song and declares it belongs to
the "fairly Lady of Shalott."


The passage adds mystery and
mysticism to this woman. Does she exist? Doesn't she? Only a song suggests she
exists.

Based on each character's strengths and weaknesses, who would make the better soldier, Cassius or Brutus?Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare

While he is flawed in that his love for Brutus prevents
his better judgment at times, that Cassius would be the better warrior and strategist if
his counsels were not disputed is evinced throughout Shakespeare's play Julius
Caesar
.


  • Cassius is, as Ceasar himself
    remarks, "lean and hungry," qualties that motive men to conquer, which is the goal of
    all soldiers.

  • Initially, he does not believe in fate, as
    does Brutus.

  • Cassius is cautious and mistrustful of men. 
    He immediately questions Marc Antony, Caesar's friend, about his motives in making an
    agreement with him and the conspirators.

  • Cassius
    understands that conquerors eliminate their enemies; therefore, he suggests killing Marc
    Antony along with Caesar:

readability="13">

 I think it is not meet
Mark Antony,
so well beloved of Caesar,
Should outlive Caesar. We shall find of him

A shrewd contriver; and you know his means,
If he improve them,
may well stretch so far
As to annoy us all, which to prevent,
Let
Antony and Caesar fall together.
(2.1.163-169)



  • After
    the assasination of Caesar, he counsels the noble-minded Brutus to not allow Marc Antony
    to speak before the Roman people because Antony may stir the crowd against
    them.

  • He realizes the importance of being decisive and
    urges Brutus to act quickly on things.

  • In Act V, he
    suggests that his and Brutus's troops wait at Sardis and make the enemy forces march to
    them, thus tiring the enemy rather than their troops.  Then, their troops can be rested
    and battle-ready.  But, Brutus refuses to do this, and this decision if fatal.  At the
    end of the play, Cassius also falls prey to superstition, but, again, he seems
    influenced by his friend Brutus, who is greatly flawed in his commitment to principle
    over practicality.

When Montag first meets Clarisse, how does she make him feel uneasy in Fahrenheit 451?

There are two ways in which Clarisse makes Montag feel
uneasy.


First, she makes him feel she is judging
him:



He felt she was walking in a
circle about him, turning him end for end, shaking him quietly, and emptying his
pockets, without once moving
herself.

These words demonstrate that
Montag felt looked at from every angle. He felt as if the items he might have had with
him were being evaluated. Perhaps he felt this way just because of Clarisse's eye for
detail. She knew how to notice.


Next, she proves that she
thinks... a lot. After asking questions about firemen putting out fires instead of
starting them, and if he ever reads books, Bradbury
narrates:



"You think too many things,"
said Montag, uneasily.

Montag is
growing uncomfortable with her ability to think. He isn't used to
it.


Finally, she questions his happiness. This causes him
to think:



Of course I'm happy. What
does she think? I'm not? he asked the quiet
rooms.

These words are obvious signs of
uneasiness. He is beginning to question himself.

How do we learn about Jane's appearance?within the first three chapters of Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte.

In the opening passages of Chapter 1 of Jane
Eyre
, the reader learns that Jane considers herself inferior to the Reed
children:


readability="10">

...I never liked long walks, especially on
chilly afternoons: dreadful to me was the coming home in the raw twilight...and humbled
by the consciousness of my physical inferiority to Eliza,
John, and Georgiana
Reed.



Also in this chapter is
Jane's mention of the "bilious" John Reed, her cousin, who stuffs cakes and sweetmeats
into his mouth constantly. When he approaches her, Jane narrates that "every morsel on
my bones shrank when he came near me," suggesting that she is much slighter than
John. 


While she explores "the depth" the mirror in the red
room reveals, she notices, too,


readability="12">

the strange little figure there gazing at me,
with a white face and arms specking the gloom, and
littering eyes of fear moving  where all else was still,
had the effect of a real spirit:   I thought it like one of the tiny
phantoms, half fairy, half
imp
.



Jane is
rather slight and plain as she also suggests in positioning herself in contrast to the
Reed children further in Chapter 2. Bewildered by her treatment, Jane wonders why she
always suffers and decides that it must be because of her physical appearance since
Georgiana who has a temper and is a "very acrid spite," with a "captious and insolent
carriage" is yet indulged because of her


readability="9">

beauty, her pink cheeks and golden curls, [that]
seemed to give delight to all who looked at her, and to purchase indeminity for every
fault.



Pondering upon all the
characteristics of the other Reed children, Jane
concludes,



I
know that had I been a sanguine, brilliant, careless, exacting, handsome, romping
child,...Mrs. Reed would have endured my presence more
complacently....



It is, thus,
more by contrast with the other children of the Reed family that the reader learns of
Jane's small and unprepossessing appearance.

In Guns, Germs, and Steel why did the diffusion of wheat from Mesopotamia prevent independent domestication elsewhere?

The basic reason for this is that it is much easier for a
society to borrow a technology (and crops are a form of technology) than it is for that
society to invent it on its own.


It may be that wild forms
of wheat were available in many parts of the world other than in Mesopotamia.  However,
once the Mesopotamians had domesticated wheat, it made much more sense for other
societies to simply borrow it from them.  Instead of having to find the appropriate
seeds and spend a long time selecting the best ones so as to get a truly domesticated
wheat variety, it would have made much more sense to simply buy seed wheat from the
Mesopotamians.


Because borrowing is easier than independent
domestication, the diffusion of wheat from Mesopotamia made it unlikely that other areas
would domesticate it on their own.

Wednesday, February 26, 2014

A production process consists of five sequential operations with defect rates of 2% ,4%, 3%, 2%, and 1%, respectively.A) How many units does the...

The production process has 5 sequential operations with
defect rates of 2%, 4%, 3%, 2% and 1% respectively.


If we
start with trying to produce x units, after the first process the number of defect free
units are x*0.98. After the second process it reduces to x*0.98*0.96. This goes on and
at the end of the production process we are left with x*0.98*0.96*0.97*0.98*0.99 =
x*0.8854 defect free units. (0.8854 is obtained after rounding off till four decimal
places)


To produce 500 defect free units, let the number of
units that we have to start with be X


X*0.8854 =
500


=> X = 500/0.8854 =
564.7


The manager should schedule the production of 565
units to be able to achieve the required number of defect free
units.


The yield loss at each step is equal to the
corresponding defect rate.


The process yield as illustrated
above is 88.54%.

What particularly does Hareton represent to Heathcliff in Wuthering Heights?

In chapter 31 of Emily Bronte's Wuthering
Heights
we find Lockwood making an analysis of what he is witnessing from the
members of the household. There is a particular interest in the character of Hareton
Earnshaw. He is a young man, messy, illiterate, but still strongly-built and with an
even bigger attitude. He is treated like a servant although he seems to be an essential
part of the manor. He also shows pride in his name, as if he had been part of a
historically-famous family.


Yet, it is Heathcliff's
behavior towards Hareton what makes Lockwood wonder what exactly is going on. We are
told from the narration that Heathcliff can hardly stand the sight of Hareton, and that
Hareton resembles his aunt Catherine more and more. Heathcliff also seems to feed off
the dysfunctional relationship between Hareton and Catherine: Although they clearly seem
to have a romantic tension going on, they choose to be mean to each
other.


This being said, there is no doubt that what Hareton
represents is a young Heathcliff back in the times when it was Catherine Earnshaw who
would tease him. Similarly, Hareton is a messy, disheveled kid just like Heathcliff was,
as a foundling. In the same way, Heathcliffhad an uncanny amount of adoration for
Catherine which later turned into hatred and hunger for revenge. He lost Catherine to
Hareton's father, and now he seems to enjoy seeing Hareton in the same
situation.


Therefore, Heathclifftreats Hareton like he was
treated when he was a child by Hareton's father, Hindley. In the same line, Heathcliff
also cathartically enjoys the tense relationship between Hareton and Catherine because
it mirrors the relationship he once had with the first Catherine right before she chose
Hindley as a husband. This fascination is all part of Heathcliff's sick and sadistic
personality: One who is so hungry for revenge that he is willing to sacrifice anything
or anyone for it.

How were the functioning of the Roman family and the institution of slavery influenced by the development of the Roman Empire? Slavery

There was not a tremendous change in family life and
slavery from the Empire and the Republic the primary change was political, and social.
The growing affluence of the Empire led its people to call for more and better sources
of entertainment and diversion. This need was met by gladiatorial fights and the
Circus Maximus. Additional diversions were theaters and the Roman
baths.


Roman society during the Empire was strongly
patriarchal. The oldest family male, either the father or grandfather, was the
paterfamilias
. He could divorce his wife at will, legally kill her if she
committed adultery, could also kill his children at will or sell them into slavery if he
wished. He could force them to marry when and whom he wished, even against their will.
Still, important decisions were made by a family council consisting of all adult males.
Roman wives were expected to exemplify the virtues of chastity, modesty, fidelity and
dedication to the family. It was she who supervised household
slaves.


Slavery actually expanded under the Empire. At one
point, one third the population of the Empire were slaves. Slavery was not based on race
or color; in fact black or Germanic slaves were considered quite desirable, and
conspicuous indicators of wealth.  Household slaves Worked as craftsmen, shopkeepers,
servants, even business agents. Many lived quite comfortably; and could expect to be
manumitted (freed) at age thirty if they had been faithful. Unfaithful servants could be
punished at the master's whim, including execution for serious
offenses.


Slaves in the countryside were not so fortunate.
They worked on large latifundia,as state owned slaves. Others were
required to work in quarries or road building. Quite often they were chained togeher in
teams to work. The work and their living conditions was so harsh that several slave
revolts resulted. The most famous revolt was led by Spartacus which required eight Roman
Legions to defeat. At its end, Spartacus was crucified for his
efforts.

How would you approach the essay topic, 'Explain how throughout history, folklore has been an important aspect of Irish development and culture.'

I think I would want to start by identifying the way in
which folklore is actually an improtant part of every single culture, not just Irish
culture. You could relate your discussion to the role of epic literature in showing how
such myths and legends--the stuff of folklore--are so vital in creating a sense of
national and cultural identity that separate people from others and give them a sense of
nationhood and something to believe in. Clearly this is something that we can easily see
to be true for the Greeks in The Iliad and The
Odyssey
, but also for the Romans in The Aeneid. I have
included a few links for you below so that you can learn more about Irish folktales, but
even the most cursory review and the enduring popularity of such tales shows how these
myths and legends are important in creating a sense of identity and self that of course
is vital in establishing an Irish culture.

Why didn't Willy choose to emulate Charley or Ben or even his father in Death of a Salesman?Is Biff's pronouncement about his father at the funeral...

Yes.


Biff's statement that
Willy had the wrong dreams is true. Willy's idea that he could become rich quick by
being well-liked and by being a salesman comes straight from a story that he hears about
a successful and well-liked salesman named Dave Singleman. The story he relates about
Singleman is that, out of a hotel room, this man would sell just about anything, and
basically that he has a sort of Midas touch to succeed in sales. When Singleman dies,
his success is so well-known that he had a funeral to which a lot of other salesman
attend. This puts Singleman, in Willy's view, in a very high level of
admiration.


Willy's father was successful but he abandons
Willy and Bernard when Willy is still a small child. Bernard is also successful and got
rich but he did invest a lot of time and effort in going into his business. Bernard's
success was a combination of personal effort and good luck. Charly and Bernard would
never come to the level of success that Willy aims to reach. The rest of the people, to
Willy, are just simply not good enough.


If Willy had a more
realistic approach at life he would have realized that nothing should be taken at face
value. He does not know exactly what sort of sacrifices Dave Singleman had to ensure to
succeed. He does not know anything else about the man, but the stories that are said
about him. Therefore, to follow the dream of another man's success is an action that is
meant to fail from the get-go. This is what Biff concludes once he sees how his father's
quest for the American Dream was futile, to say the least.

In To Kill a Mockingbird, what do we learn about the Cunninghams from Chapter 2?

Scout first tells us about the "Cunningham tribe" in
Chapter 1, when she relates that young Boo Radley had "become acquainted" with the
Cunninghams, who hailed from Old Sarum, an area of northern Maycomb County. The
Cunninghams were a ne'er-do-well group that hung out at the Dew-Drop Inn and drank
stumphole whiskey.


readability="5">

Nobody in Maycomb had nerve enough to tell Mr.
Radley that his boy was in with the wrong
crowd.



In Chapter 2,
Scout tries to defend Walter Cunningham Jr., a classmate who has hookworms and no lunch
money. Walter is too shy to stand up for himself, so Scout tries to explain about
Walter's poor family to her teacher, Miss Caroline. Instead, Miss Caroline spanks
Scout for her efforts.


Scout knew about the Cunningham
family because Atticus had once represented Walter's father. Mr. Cunningham, a poor but
honest farmer, told Atticus that he didn't know when he'd be able to pay for Atticus'
services.



"Let
that be the least of your worries, Walter," Atticus
said.



Atticus explained to
Scout that he would eventually be repaid, and sure enough, Atticus was right. Mr.
Cunningham paid for Atticus' counsel in trade--hickory nuts, smilax, holly and turnip
greens. 

Tuesday, February 25, 2014

Why are there still poor people in America half a century after the implementation of a system of social welfare programs that were designed to...

The way a person answers this question depends largely on
their political ideology.  Therefore, there are many possible
answers.


A conservative might argue that poverty persists
precisely because of those programs.  Such a person would
say that welfare programs have encouraged poor people to develop bad habits in which
they rely on the government for help.  The poor would be better off if they would be
made to find work and develop the habits that lead to
success.


A liberal might argue that poverty persists
because the social programs you mentioned have been too limited or have not been done in
the right way.  Such a person would argue that our government does not do enough to help
poor people obtain child care so they can work, or get job training so they can find a
good job.  Such a person might argue that the government has not done enough to help
poor children get a better education.


So, depending on
one's political ideology, one can attribute the persistence of poverty to excessive
government action or to lack of government action.

What is the equation of a line passing through the intersection of two other lines and a point?L1 y=-x/2 L2 y=2x+5 point (1,2)

We have to find the equation of the line that is passing
through two points. One point is given. The next point represents the intercepting point
of the given lines. To determine this point, we'll have to solve the system of the
equations of the lines.


y=-x/2 - 5
(1)


y=2x+5 (2)


We'll equate
(1) and (2):


-x/2 - 5 = 2x +
5


We'll subtract 2x both
sides:


-x/2 - 2x - 5 = 5


We'll
add 5 both sides:


-5x/2 =
5+5


-5x/2 = 10


-5x = 20
=> x = -4


We'll replace x in
(2):


y = -8 + 5


y =
-3


The intercepting point of the lines L1 and L2 is: (-4 ;
-3).


Now, we'll write the equation of the line that passes
through the points (1 ; 2) and (-4 ; -3).


(x2 - x1)/(x -
x1) = (y2 - y1)/(y - y1)


(-4 - 1)/(x - 1) = (-3 - 2)/(y -
2)


-5/(x - 1) = -5/(y - 2)


x -
1 = y - 2


The equation of the line that
passes through the point (1 ; 2) and the intercepting point of the lines L1 and L2 is: x
- y + 1 = 0.

What literary devices are used in "The Most Dangerous Game"?

There are many literary devices used in Connell's short
story "The Most Dangerous Game".


1. The following quote
contains personification (the giving of human characteristics to nonhuman/nonliving
things):



dank
tropical night that was palpable as it pressed its thick warm blackness in upon the
yacht.



This is an example of
personification given night cannot physically press itself against something (this is a
characteristic and human possesses, not something night can typically
"do."


2. The next example is a simile. A simile is the
comparison between two unlike things using "like" or
"as".



"Ugh!
It's like moist black
velvet."



Here, the night is
compared to black velvet.


Another example of a simile
is:



The sea
was as flat as a plate-glass
window.



Here, the sea is
compared to a window.


3. "Bleak blackness" is an example of
alliteration. Alliteration is the repetition of a consonant sound (typically used in
poetry). Here the "b" sound repeats and creates exemplifies
alliteration.

Monday, February 24, 2014

How can you measure the effectivity of a soundproof material?Please help!

This is a challenging question.  Effectivity is a very
subjective term.  Think about the soundproofing in an automobile...or the soundproofing
in a radio broadcasting booth,  On a small scale if you desire to measure the direct
effectiveness of different  materials, build a small box (probably two feet in each
direction of 3/4 inch plywood...thinner material will be deflected by the sound
inside...wire a small speaker to one wall of the box and line the box with the desired
test material.  Place a small decibel meter outside the box away from the speaker wall
at a close distance from the box and using a suitable radio, or hi fi system, play sound
through the speaker.  The readings on the decibel meter will give a direct correlation
between the different types of material used to line the inside walls of the box. This
test box could be used to give information about the frequency range effectiveness of
the different tested materials. If you have access to an oscilloscope, you might get
some interesting information about the acoustic properties of various materials used in
soundproofing.  Enjoy the experimenting

In "The Gift of the Magi," why is Jim particularly sorry that Della has cut her hair?

The answer to your question can be found at the end of the
story. Having sold her hair so that she could buy Jim the present for Christmas that she
wanted, Della is shocked to receive Jim's gift for her: a set of haircombs. The irony of
this situation is not lost on herself, Jim, and us as the
reader:



For
there lay The Combs--the set of combs, side and back, that Della had worshiped for long
in a Broadway window. Beautiful combs, pure tortoise shelll, with jeweled rims--just the
shade to wear in the beautiful vanished hair. they were expensive combs, she knew, and
her heart had simply craved an dyearned over them without the least hope of possession.
And now, they were hers, but the tresses that should have adorned the coveted adornments
were gone.



Thus it is that
Jim is particularly sorry that Della has cut her hair because now she will not be able
to enjoy the present that he has sacrificed so much to buy for
her.

Who are the main characters and what is the conflict in The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini?

The two main characters in Khaled Hosseini's The
Kite Runner
 are Amir, the protagonist and narrator, and his father, Baba.
Another primary character is Hassan, a servant and friend of Amir. The setting of the
first part of the novel is Kabul, Afghanistan, where Baba is a wealthy businessman. Baba
and Amir later move to California following the Russian invasion of their country, which
involves one of the many conflicts found in the story.


One
of the major conflicts arises between Amir and Hassan. Amir is never able to fully
accept Hassan--who is of the lowly ethnic group, the Hazara--as a friend or equal. Amir
later commits several transgressions against Hassan for which he is forever haunted;
Amir's search for atonement for his acts is a major theme of the novel. Another conflict
comes in the relationship between Amir and Baba. Baba is ashamed of his young son, who
prefers literary pursuits over the physical, athletic traits that Baba so desires. As
Amir grows into an adult, the two manage to resolve most of their differences. A third
major conflict occurs when Amir returns to Afghanistan to search for Hassan's son, who
Amir discovers is also his half-nephew. Amir's dangerous mission is successful, yet more
conlficts arise during his stay in Afghanistan and Pakistan, and when he returns to
California with Sohrab, his nephew. 

In act 1 scene 7 of Shakespeare's Macbeth, Lady Macbeth emerges as the stronger of the two as she persuades her husband to murder Duncan. Elaborate...

In Act 1, scene 7 of Shaksepeare’s tragedy
Macbeth, Lady Macbeth emerges as stronger than her husband in a
number of different ways. As the scene opens, Macbeth is contemplating the murder of
Duncan, his king, but is hesitating about actually committing the deed. However, while
Macbeth spends the first half of the scene pondering and feeling ambivalent, Lady
Macbeth, when she arrives, is full of energy, determination, and questions.  Her
sentences are initially brief and clipped: “He [that is, the king] has almost supped.
Why have you [that is, Macbeth] left the chamber?” (1.7. 29). There is already a hint of
rebuke in her opening question here, as well as in the question that immediately follows
(1.7.30).


Notice, in fact, how many of her opening
sentences are quick questions; she is clearly annoyed with her husband, implying that he
is insufficiently resolute (1.7.35-38). She even implies that if he is slack in his
ambition, he must also be slack in his love for her (1.7.38-39). Her taunting questions
continue when she implies that he is timorous or
fearful:



. . .
Art thou afeard


To be the same in thine own act and
valor


As thou art in desire?
(1.7.39-41)



She actually
raises the possibility that he may be a “coward” and literally likens him to the
proverbial “fraidy cat” (1.7.41-45). Of course, by rebuking her husband in this way, she
implies that she herself possesses all the traits he apparently lacks: ambition,
resolution, determination, fearlessness, and manly
courage.


Indeed, she challenges Macbeth’s masculinity,
implying that he is no longer a “man” (1.7.49). She reminds him of his earlier ambitions
and upbraids him for being fickle (1.7.51-54). Then, in some of the most famous lines
Shakespeare ever wrote, she claims that she would be willing to dash out her own baby’s
brains if she had to do so to achieve announced ambitions. Ironically, these lines make
her sound like the very “beast” she had earlier accused Macbeth of being
(1.7.47).


When Macbeth asks what will happen if they should
fail to kill the king, she responds with another very abrupt question: “We fail?”
(1.7.59). It is as if she cannot even imagine that possibility. It is Lady Macbeth, in
fact – not her husband – who now outlines the details of the practical plot that will
allow them to succeed (1.7.61-72).


She thus shows the kind
of initiative and inventiveness she finds sorely lacking in her husband, whom she
regards with a kind of contempt but whose ambitions she also seeks to re-arouse. In
essence, she takes command, and she speaks so forcefully that Macbeth’s response implies
that he is simultaneously intimidated, astonished, and impressed
(1.7.72-74).


He also now seems to accept her plan of action
and adds to it – a practical plan he might never have considered if she had not first
proposed it (1.7.74-77). It is he who is now asking questions, and she is the one who
provides ready, confident answers (1.7.74-79). She even elaborates upon her plan
(1.7.77-79), once again showing initiative and inventiveness. Urged on by his powerful,
almost over-powering wife, Macbeth now agrees to commit the murder, but even his
resolution seems somewhat irresolute, as when he refers to the planned murder as a
“terrible feat” and when he alludes to his own “false heart” (1.7.80, 82). Even as the
scene concludes, then, he seems far less powerful than his wife.

Describe each of the following lines from "The Lady of Shalott" in detail, please:On either side the river lie Long fields of barley and of rye,...

Part I.  On both sides of the river are fields, and in the
middle of these fields is a road that leads to Camelot.  Many people travel this road
and gaze on the island of Shalott, home of the Lady of Shalott.  No one has ever seen
her, but reapers hear her song in the morning and evening, declaring it to be "the fairy
of Shalott.


Part II. She weaves day and night a web of
bright colors. She has heard it said that if she looks toward Camelot, she will be
cursed.  She doesn't know what the curse is, so she continues to weave.  S he looks in a
mirror to see Camelot, avoiding looking at it directly.  She watches shadows of people
going to Camelot.  Sometimes a group of happy girls, sometimes a priest, a shepherd, and
once in a while knights will come, riding two by two.  She doesn't have a knight to
protect her. She weaves all of these scenes into her web.  Finally she admits that she
is tired of seeing all her sights through the mirror.


Part
III. One day Sir Lancelot arrives in Camelot.  He is very handsome (this goes on for
some lines) and enjoys singing on his journey.  Even though she knows it is forbidden,
she looks down on Camelot.  When she does, her web flies out the window, the mirrror
cracks, and she knows she is cursed.


Part IV.  That
evening, when it is raining, the Lady of Shalott walks to the river and finds a boat. 
She writes her name on it.  In a glassy trance, she unties the boat, lies down in it,
and allows  the river to bear her into Camelot.  Dressed all in white, she floats down
to Camelot singing her last song.  Before she reaches Camelot, she dies.  She silently
enters Camelot, and everyone comes out to stare at her corpse.  The knights all cross
themselves for fear of what this means.  Lancelot arrive, compliments her beauty, and
asks God to bless her.

Please explain the following stanza of the poem "Punishment" by Seamus Heaney.Under which at firstshe was a barked saplingthat is dug upoak-bone,...

Let us just remember the overall context of this poem. It
begins by describing the way in which a woman was punished by death for committing
adultery in her time period. The corpse of this woman was found in 1951 in a peat bog,
having been preserved for centuries and therefore open to analysis and investigation.
The stanza you have identified relates the formation of the peat with the preservation
of the corpse. Peat is of course formed by dead trees that, over a long period of time,
becomes transformed in to peat. Thus the stanza points out the way that her existence
became intermingled with those of the trees that formed the peat that preserved her.
This is why the stanza says she was at first "a barked sapling." The last line points
towards the curious fusion of human matter with trees, reinforcing the way that peat has
preserved the corpse over all fo these years.

Sunday, February 23, 2014

Describe the main terms, defintions and concepts of the psychoanalytic theory of development.

Psychoanalytic theory suggests that human development is
largely influenced by progression through stages of psychosexual development. Sigmund
Freud, the father of psychoanalytic theory, believed that children become fixated on
specific objects while in specific psychosexual stages. Frued believed that psychopathy
could result from unsuccessful transition between these
stages.


The stages Frued hypothesized are the oral, the
anal, the phallic, the latency, and the genital stages. The oral stage (birth to 21
months) is marked by oral fixations and Frued hypothesized that the oral area was the
primary erogenous zone. Similarly, the anal stage (2 years of age) is associated with
the 'erogenous zone' of the anus. Frued believed that unsuccessful transition from this
stage could result in anal expulsive or anal retentive character traits. The phallic
stage (ages 3-6) is similarlly associated with the genitalia. The fourth stage, the
latency stage(3-13) is often not described as a stage, and rather as a period between
stages. It signifies the time between the end of the phallic stage and the beginning of
the final stage, the genital stage. The genital stage is the final stage of development
and signifies the development of puberty, along with sexual urges twoards the opposite
sex.


Freud believed that individuals who successfully
navigated these stages developed into 'normal' adults, whereas those who did not were
fixated on certain stages. Most of the psychopathy described by psychoanalytic theory is
associated with events during these stages.

Compare The Road and Frankenstein.

I think that both of them place an emphasis on the
relationship between father and son, the creator and the created.  McCarthy's work
reflects a redemptive quality to this dynamic.  In a world where all else is desolate,
there is fertility and emotional salvation in the manner in which the father loves and
cares for his son.  There is an unconditional element that is present in their
relationship that marks this relationship.  Shelley's work might present the opposite of
this experience.  The relationship between Victor and the monster is one of resentment
and abandonment.  Confronted with the reality of Victor's creation, he abandons it and
abdicates his responsibility.  The father in McCarthy's work has every opportunity to
leave his son, given the setting, but never does.  There is a selflessness that is
present in his actions that Victor completely lacks as a father- figure, himself.  I
think that exploring how both works can show the different extremes of men towards their
responsibilities would be a point of significant comparison between both
works.

Question about the Constitution, British monarchy, and the Articles of Confederation. Please see below.How do the principles of government...

The Constitution was meant to be a middle ground between
the British monarchy and the Articles of Confederation.  The British monarchy was a
government that was too centralized and powerful.  Under the Articles of Confederation,
the US had a national government that was too weak and decentralized.  The Constitution
attempted to find a balance between these two extremes.


To
do this, the Constitution created a federal system.  This system had a national
government that was quite a bit stronger than it had been under the Articles.  At the
same time, though, certain powers were reserved to the states.  This reduced the risk of
the central government tyrannizing the states as had been done when the British monarchy
ruled the American colonies.


This federal system (in
addition to the checks and balances written into the design of the federal government)
was meant to reach a middle ground between two extremes that did not work very
well.

In Gary Schmidt's The Wednesday Wars, what is a good trait to describe Holling?

In Gary Schmidt's The Wednesday Wars,
I think one of the characteristics that best describes Hollis is "funny." Hollis is a
funny and quirky kind of kid, in more than one way. He is "funny" in the sense of
unusual. Mrs. Baker notices this right away because he needs to
spend his Wednesdays with her when the Jewish kids go to Hebrew School and the Catholic
kids go to Catechism. Mrs. Baker is not happy about having Holling in her room, but this
will not last. However, at the outset, Holling is "funny" in that he stands out from the
rest of the students with Mrs. Baker.


I personally find
Holling "funny" because of his way of looking at things. He has a humorous outlook, and
perhaps it is this that helps him deal with situations in his life that are of concern
to him. First, he is sure Mrs. Baker hates him.


readability="7">

Of all the kids in the seventh grade at Camillo
Junior High, there was one kid that Mrs. Baker hated with heat whiter than the
sun...Me.



His ability to
exaggerate (hate hotter than that of the sun...) is amusing, and he makes me not only
want to laugh, but find out other ways in which he sees the
world.


Holling's summation of love is funny,
too:



Love and
hate in seventh grade are not far apart, let me tell
you.



At another point,
Holling has the "funny" ability to try to put himself in the same situation as Mrs.
Baker, though it doesn't work: he describes how he is feeling in the face of what he
perceives as Mrs. Baker's hatred. (His ability to make me
understand/remember being a kid, is also a part of "funny" that Holling is able to
convey.)



And
probably that's the same look that came over my face, since I felt the way you feel just
before you throw up...If Mrs. Baker was feeling like she was going to throw up, too, she
didn't show it.



Different
people respond differently to worries or difficulties that present themselves. Holling
has a way of using his humor to lighten things up and his ability to be "funny" may well
to help him see things in a humorous light, while he takes his listener with
him.

Saturday, February 22, 2014

What are three aspects of style used in Lord of the Flies?Indicate how each element and style is used effectively.

In Lord of the Flies, Golding uses a omniscient third
person narrator. The story mostly follows Ralph, but occasionally follows another
character:


readability="11">

Golding uses the omniscient point of view, which
enables him to stand outside and above the story itself, making no reference to the
inner life of any of the individual characters. From this lofty point he comments on the
action from the point of view of a removed, but observant,
bystander.



Another example of
style is Golding's use of a simple story line that has heavy symbolic
material:


readability="9">

Golding makes his novel come alive with a
significant use of symbolism, physiological development, and general truths.  His
writing style is simple but the subject matter is deep.  He uses a rather comparatively
simple story to convey a weighty
idea.



Golding uses symbolism
to convey messages. The pig's head on a stick is of course a central
idea:



Simon
realizes that the pig's head represents an evil so strong that it has the power to make
him faint. When he thinks of the head as "The Lord of the Flies," the symbol becomes
even more powerful, as this title is a translation of "Beelzebub," another name for the
Devil.



The pig's head
represents anarchy. Without a code of honor, the boys get caught up in a murderous
frenzy and innocent boys die.


Without order and authority,
the boys' lives become chaotic and filled with danger. Through general truths, Golding
is able to share a convincing message on the importance of authority and civilized
order. The natural instinct of man is dangerous. It is innately
evil.


Golding's style leaves the reader with an important
message through his use of symbolism, setting, and general truths.

In Toni Morrison's story, "Recitatif," what is the main struggle of the protagonist?

In Toni Morrison's short story, entitled, "Recitatif," the
narrator is Twyla, a black girl. Her story begins while she is in an orphanage (though
her mother is not dead). Her new white roommate, Roberta, is not at first a welcome part
of her life, but eventually the two children (both eight-years old) become buddies.
While they are at St. Bonny's (St. Bonaventure), the two unlikely friends are pushed
around by the older kids, but life is not so bad, especially for Twyla who now is cared
for and fed.


When the girls leave to go home, they lose
touch. It is here that we see difficulties arising between the two women. They meet in
their late teens—most likely—but suddenly race separates them. At the place where Twyla
works, Roberta arrives with two "hippies." They have little time for Twyla who leaves
feeling snubbed.


When Roberta and Twyla meet many months
later at the grocery store, Roberta is as Twyla remembers her. They share coffee,
memories and laughs. It seems that the comfortable relationship of their youth has been
restored. Twyla is pretty stoic about the past, and she chooses to forget Roberta's
previous "snub." Of course, the two have married and become parents, and it seems that
what caused a separation between them has become unimportant and forgotten—perhaps as
the last vestiges of immaturity…at least for a
while.


However, Twyla and Roberta come face-to-face at
their next meeting across picket lines. Roberta and her white neighbors are protesting
the busing of their children into black neighborhoods. Here Twyla realizes that she and
Roberta are truly separated by race, something that it seems Twyla
had ever seriously considered…for it was never an issue between them as kids. However,
it is an issue now—this protest is the result of segregation in a
time when things were getting ready to dramatically change in America, as the Civil
Rights Movement is gaining momentum. Twyla seems confused by Roberta's behavior as if
she cannot understand how her friend could be a part of racial demonstrations. They
stand on opposite sides of a fence.


As they try to move
around these issues, I think Twyla is puzzled by Roberta's actions. As the world
changes, the two women change as well; harsh words are exchanged as Roberta accuses
Twyla of kicking the fallen Maggie in the orchard—kicking a black
woman. Twyla remembers none of this—Roberta accuses Twyla of being a
"bigot."


Twyla seems to struggle with the question of race
where she and Roberta are concerned more than anything: that is the focus of the story.
They defined each other very early one. As they grow up, racial tensions creep into
their friendship causing Twyla to re-evaluate their connection because of the way
Roberta changes through the story. She is becoming civic-minded. It seems that as each
women comes to terms with the changes around her, she becomes more aware of life's
challenges. Twyla doesn't understand Roberta, but tries to hold onto the friendship they
shared early on. This shows how the women grow up, the stages of social development they
go through as adults, and how race finally becomes unimportant—but for Twyla, kindness
and good character are no less important. Staring a new phase of her life, now Twyla
tries desperately to understand how she could ever have been so
blind to the needs of Maggie. Twyla has started to worry less for self and more for
others.

What is a strong thesis statement for Jesus' Son by Denis Johnson?

In that Jesus' Son by Denis Johnson
begins with a catastrophic car accident in "Car Crash While Hitchhiking," it will come
as no surprise that the stories related thereafter are symbolic car
wrecks...



...a
series of head-on collisions that Johnson’s narrator—an on-the-run
junkie—encounters...



The life
of the narrator of the book is one long attempt to survive seemingly endless days that
are like car wrecks. While Johnson is presenting a literal (and
tumultuous) recounting of the narrator's days as he looks for drugs and meets a variety
of people, the narrator is figuratively looking for some sense in those days. The
details and the faces become mixed up and we realize that they are simply a reflection
of the narrator's fragmented existence. While there are themes presented with some of
the characters that reflect a search for religion—or at least the easing of the
spirit—the narrator is not at this point yet. His search is on-going, but one can assume
that if he is even aware of that fact that there
is a search, he has no clue how to go about finding a location in
the world where peace of mind and/or a healthy spirit have a
place.


If I had to write a paper on this book, my thesis
statement would probably sound something like this:


readability="11">

In Denis Johnson's non-traditional novel
entitled Jesus' Son, the narrator—a "child of God"—is living a
fragmented existence; while those around him may be searching for answers, the confusion
in his mind and among those he meets keeps the narrator off-balance
as he attempts to find meaning in a life that is much like the "car wreck" described in
the first chapter, "Car Crash While
Hitchhiking."


Friday, February 21, 2014

Explain the meaning and also the pun mentioned in Rosalind's speech in ACT 1 SCENE 2WITH bills on their neck....... by these presents.'

The quote by Rosalind in "As You Like It" is a pun. ( A
pun is a joke which exploits different plausible meanings of a word. Another definition
of a pun relies on the fact that  or the fact that there are words that sound alike but
have different meanings.)


The pun exists in Rosalind's
quote given the actual word which she is referring to is 'presence' (seen in the
previous line spoken by Le Beau) and not "presents."


The
meaning behind the pun used by Rosalind refers to the fact that while the men are being
presented as "of excellent growth and presence", Rosalind recognizes them as common
criminals. This comes from the fact that, during this time period, bills were used as a
legal tool which allowed people to see what crimes a person had been charged with. Bills
were often placed above a criminal placed in shackles so that everyone would know what
they have been found guilty of.

In Shakespeare's play Macbeth, how does the title character attempt to cover up his treachery?

In Shakespeare’s play Macbeth, the
title character begins to attempt to cover up his murder of the king very quickly after
the murder is committed.  Significantly, however, it is his wife, Lady Macbeth, who is
the first to suggest practical action.  She is often the instigator of actions in the
first half of the play, and it was she, of course, who urged her husband to murder the
king in the first place.  Therefore it seems fitting that she should also be the one who
initially takes the lead in attempting to cover up the crime.  Thus she tells her
husband (in the “Open Source Shakespeare” edition of the play
[www.opensourceshakespeare.org]):


readability="8">

. . . Go get some water,
And wash this
filthy witness from your hand.
Why did you bring these daggers from the
place?
They must lie there: go carry them; and smear
The sleepy
grooms with blood. 
(706-10)



Of course, the play
will subsequently show that responsibility for the crime cannot be hidden as easily as
this, either from others or from Macbeth.


Unsurprisingly,
it is Lady Macbeth who once again takes the initiative when her husband seems to
falter:



. . .
Infirm of purpose!
Give me the daggers: the sleeping and the
dead
Are but as pictures: 'tis the eye of childhood
That fears a
painted devil. If he do bleed,
I'll gild the faces of the grooms withal;

For it must seem their guilt.
(714-19)



When Macbeth again
seems to regret what he has done, Lady Macbeth once more speaks with an authority and
self-assurance that later prove extremely ironic:


readability="7">

A little water clears us of this deed:

How easy is it, then! Your constancy
Hath left you unattended.
(734-36)



A few seconds later,
she again instructs her husband, this time advising him to change his
clothing:



Get
on your nightgown, lest occasion call us,
And show us to be watchers. Be not
lost
So poorly in your thoughts.
(739-41)



Later, Macbeth
pretends as if nothing has happened when a visitor comes calling for the
king:


readability="12">

Macduff. Is the
king stirring, worthy thane?


Macbeth.
Not yet.


Macduff.
He did command me to call timely on him:


I
have almost slipp'd the hour.


Macbeth.
I'll bring you to him.
(809-13)



Almost immediately
after killing the king, then, Macbeth and his wife must undertake a task far more
difficult than committing the crime itself: attempting to distance themselves from being
suspected of the murder.

In 'Animal Farm, Chapter 5', how does Napoleon communicate with the other animals?

It is in Chapter 5 where the communication between
Napoleon and the other animals is one that is continued through the embrace of other
forces and other means as opposed to direct and open articulation with the animals.  The
battle of speeches between he and Snowball about the building of the windmill would be a
good example of this.  Snowball makes an impassioned speech that connects the well-
being and the future of the farm with the construction of the windmill.  This
communication is direct, and pointed to the animals.  Yet, Napoleon does not really
bother with trying to make his point.  When he signals the attack dogs to run off
Snowball, it is a moment where Napoleon communicates with the animals through force. 
Napoleon was never one for speeches, but his statement and symbolic action of
terrorizing Snowball off the farm communicates to the animals the dire consequence of
standing up against him.  At the same time, Napoleon begins to insulate himself with the
trappings of power that this becomes the means through which communication with the
animals happens.  The idea of using Squealer as a means to communicate with the animals
as well as being able to employ Minimus to compose songs that praise Napoleon help to
further this idea that communication between Napoleon and the animals is a means through
which there are other filters and prisms that have one common thread which is the
affirmation of Napoleon's unquestioned power on the farm and over the
animals.

What does it mean when the question is why does Lady Macbeth apply the spur in Macbeth? The quotation is: "That tears shall drown the wind. I...

In the above quotation, Lady Macbeth is considering her
role in trying to persuade Macbeth to follow his ambition to become king by murdering
Duncan.  The line "I have no spur to prick the sides of my intent" means that Lady
Macbeth knows that she herself has no real reason to want Duncan dead--she only wants
him dead so that her "vaulting ambition" may push her husband into action.  Later, Lady
Macbeth convinces her husband that he deserves to be king, and thereby "applies the
spur" to induce action.  Earlier, when Lady Macbeth receives the letter from Macbeth
detailing the witches' prediction, Lady Macbeth knows that her husband will likely not
act on his inner desires because she thinks he is too good a person to go after what he
wants.  So, she knows that her ambition will have to overtake his in order to occupy the
throne.

summary of the rattrap

The rattrap seller is a homeless fellow who stays in the
crofter’s cottage for a night. The crofter entertains him as a guest and friend. But the
rattrap seller returns later the next day, smashes the window pane and steals the money
of the crofter. The fortune however turns later when the iron master mistaking him to be
an old comrade takes him home. There he stays for two days as his guest. Once again he
is on his way to continue his usual profession of selling rattraps, thievery and
begging. But he sends a letter to the iron masters daughter telling her that she was a
wonderful hostess and he cannot lie to her. He also returned the money that he had
stolen from the crofter and asked her to return it. He lets her know that this whole
world is like a rat trap. Just like the rats are trapped by cheese and food similarly
men are lured by land, food, shelter, clothing etc. these are baits. Those who touch
them are trapped.

What is the scientist’s next step?A scientist conducted research on the reproductive patterns of sponges. He is now interested in sharing his...

I also think that answer should
be


C) The scientist should compile his findings into a
paper and submit it to peer reviewed journals and other
publications.


So that scientist can get help or opinion
about his research. Let us know what is real answer.


href="http://jaygroup.com/services/third-party-logistics.aspx">3rd party
logistics

In Gary Schmidt's novel The Wednesday Wars, why does Mrs. Baker say "Chrysanthemum" to Holling?

In Gary D. Schmidt’s novel for young readers titled
The Wednesday Wars, the word “chrysanthemum” occurs at two crucial
moments.  Early in the novel, Holling Hoodhood good-naturedly offers his teacher, Mrs.
Baker, some advice (which she generally welcomes) about how to be an even more effective
teacher. He suggests that when a student does something well, she should let the student
know by using some kind of secret code. She asks him what specific code she should use.
He replies,


readability="8">

“Well, maybe ‘Azalea’ for something good, and
‘Chrysanthemum’ for something really
good.’”



In response, Mrs.
Baker thanks Holling for this advice but says that she will simply say in plain English
when someone has done something well.


Later in the book,
after Holling stands up to his domineering father and expresses his own honest opinion
about how life should be lived, Holling feels somewhat
isolated.


After a discussion in which Mrs. Baker implies
that Holling will ultimately live a good and satisfying life, he wishes her
well.



And she
smiled – not a teacher smile. “Chrysanthemum,” she
said.



In other words, Mrs.
Baker uses the code that Holling had long ago suggested in order to communicate her
approval of – and admiration for – his recent
behavior.


This moment is significant for several reasons,
including the following:


  • Mrs. Baker’s reply
    suggests that she had paid careful attention to Holling earlier and had perhaps been
    gently amused by his suggested code, even though she had not used it at
    first.

  • Her reply suggests that she never forgot that
    earlier conversation, even though she had seemed at the time to dismiss his
    suggestion.

  • Her reply suggests the special bond that has
    now developed between this teacher and this student.

  • Her
    reply suggests that she wants to communicate her approval to Holling in a way that he
    will especially appreciate and perhaps without her being too
    sentimental.

  • Her reply suggests that she realizes that
    Holling will realize the special nature of her communication.  This
    is an exchange that only he will understand.

Thursday, February 20, 2014

"You are the smith of your own destiny." Discuss in relation to "The Neclace."

What a great statement to use to analyse this excellent
short story! In a sense, we can rephrase this statement by refering to a common phrase
or parable in the English language: "You make your own bed, then you have to lie in it."
If we think of these two statements in regard to this story, and more particularly in
regard to the character of Mathilde Loisel. The story makes it clear that she has every
reason to be happy. Without any dowry or prospects, she is married to a minor clerk and
is able to experience a comfortable life. Even though in a sense her marriage brought
her "up" in the world, she lived as "a woman who has come down in the world." The
beginning of the story makes it clear that she devoted herself to a feeling of
dissatisfaction, rather than choosing to enjoy the relative wealth that she
had:



She
grieved incessantly, feeling that she had been born for all the little niceties and
luxuries of living. She grieved over the shabbiness of her apartment, the dinginess of
the walls, the worn-out appearance of the chairs, the ugliness of the draperies. All
these things, which another woman of her class would not even have noticed, gnawed at
her and made her
furious.



Note the way that
the text makes it clear that another woman of Mathilde's class would not even have
noticed the things that place her into such a fit of grieving and dissatisfaction. The
daydreams that she turns to as relief for her grief show that she is determined to not
accept the reality of her state and cannot be grateful for what she has. Thus it is that
we can argue the rest of the story shows the statement to be true. It was Mathilde's own
greed for jewelry and for the appearance of wealth that led her to borrow a necklace
from her friend, which in turn led to the loss of the necklace and Mathilde's subsequent
falling into even greater poverty. Life is what you make of it, and Mathilde's refusal
to be grateful for the simple luxuries that she had resulted in her loss of even
those.

What is the relationship between main plot and subplot in King Lear?

The main plot and subplot in King Lear make the play
exceedingly complicated, especially since both old men are forced to leave their homes
and roam the countryside in different places. Added to this, Cordelia is far away in
France and Edgar is hiding out somewhere in the open country. Shakespeare shows a
boldness in the construction of this play and a disregard of the Aristotelian unities
that is unprecedented. All the characters are scattered in different places. Goneril and
Regan are given different domains, so they too are separated much of the time.
Meanwhile, Kent is a vagabond because he has been exiled by Lear. Oswald appears in
several different places. No one knows what happened to Lear's one hundred knights. The
Fool drops out of sight. Shakespeare must have had much confidence in himself and in his
audience, especially since he had to present all of this on a small stage with very
limited scenery and props.


Shakespeare may have felt he
needed a subplot because nothing much happens to Lear after he disowns his two daughters
and goes off on his own. Lear can do nothing to regain his power or to get revenge
against Goneril and Regan. There would have been, so to speak, "no second act."
Cordelia’s invasion from France has a deus ex machina quality about it. Shakespeare
devised the subplot to suggest that children turning against their parents was not an
isolated phenomenon but to dramatize what he believed was common in human nature. In
Lear’s case it was daughters, in Gloucester’s it was a son who thrust the older
generation out into the cold.


At that stage in his life
Shakespeare was becoming quite cynical about humanity, as he shows in his
Timon of Athens, for example. And here is a pertinent quote from
his Measure for Measure:


readability="17">

Friend hast thou
none,


For thine own bowels, which do call thee
sire,


The mere effusion of thy proper
loins,


Do curse the gout, serpigo, and the
rheum,


For ending thee no
sooner.



It should be noted
that Shakespeare is not only showing children against fathers but brother against
brother and sister against sister, even servant against master. In Act 4, Scene 2, the
Duke of Albany, thoroughly disgusted with his wife Goneril,
says:



If that
the heavens do not their visible spirits


Send quickly down
to tame these vile offences,


It will
come,


Humanity must perforce prey on
itself,


Like monsters of the
deep.


Find the rectangular form of number 2(cos200+isin200)? explain Argand diagram.

The given form of the complex number is the polar
form.


To find the rectangular form, we'll have to calculate
the real and imaginary parts of the complex number.


We'll
remove the brackets and we'll have:


z = 2cos200 +
2isin200


We'll calculate the values of cos200 and
sin200,knowing that they are negative, since the angle of 200 belongs to the 3rd
quadrant:


sin200 =
-0.342


cos200 = -0.939


The
Argand diagram allows us to consider the x axis as the real axis of a complex number and
y axis represents the imaginary axis of a complex number, such as, the complex number
can be represented as a point in the Argand
diagram.


The rectangular form of the given
complex number is:


z = -1.879
- 0.684i

how do i solve: 1/b-a + 1/a+b and 3y-1/2y^2+y-3 - 2-y/y-1 - y/1-yalgebra

You cannot solve these, only simplify.  I see that you use
spaces, but it is easier to undersand if you use
parenthesis.


I am suspecting you
mean


(a) 1/(b-a) + 1/(a+b) -
2b/(a^2-b^2)


(b) (3y-1)/(2y^2+y-3) - (2-y)/(y-1) -
y/(1-y)


(a) First note that 1/(b-a) = -1/(a-b) since (b-a)
= -(a-b)
Now we can factor (a^2-b^2) = (a-b)(a+b) and our expression
is


-1/(a-b) + 1/(a+b) -
2b/((a+b)/(a-b))


Now like all fractions we can only add if
we have a common denominator so I am going to multiply -1/(a-b) * (a+b)/(a+b).  I can do
this because (a+b)/(a+b)=1 and I can always multiply by 1.  With the same idea I can
multiply 1/(a+b) by (a-b)/(a-b) again because (a-b)/(a-b) = 1. so I
get


(-1(a+b))/((a-b)(a+b)) + (1(a-b)/((a-b)(a+b)) -
2b((a+b)(a-b))


Please verify that if you simplify
everything I get the original equation.  Now that I have the same denominator, I add the
numerators, just like (1/4+2/4 = 3/4).


(-1(a+b) + 1(a-b) -
2b)/((a+b)(a-b))  Now use the distributive property to simplify the
numerator.


(-a + -b + a + -b + -2b)/((a+b)(a-b)) =
(-4b)/((a+b)(a-b)) = -4b/((a+b)(a-b)).


So 1/(b-a) + 1/(a+b)
- 2b/(a^2-b^2) = -4b/((a+b)(a-b))


(b) (3y-1)/(2y^2+y-3) -
(2-y)/(y-1) - y/(1-y)  first factor,
2y^2 + y - 3 = (2y+3)(y-1). and (1-y) =
-(y-1) so y/(1-y) = -y/(y-1). this gives
us


(3y-1)/((2y+3)(y-1)) - (2-y)/(y-1) - (-y/(y-1)) Now we
need a common denominator which is (2y+3)(y-1) so multiply the last two rational
expressions with (2y+3)/(2y+3) to get


(3y-1)/((2y+3)(y-1))
- ((2-y)(2y+3))/((y-1)(2y+3)) - (-y(2y+3)/((y-1)(2y+3))


Now
we have the same denominator we can add the numerators
again


((3y-1) - (2-y)(2y+3) - (-y(2y+3)))/((y-1)(2y+3)) 
Now distribute to get


(3y - 1 - (4y - 2y^2 + 6 - 3y) -
(-2y^2 - 3y))/((y-1)(2y+3))  Now change subtractions to additions by changing the sign
of what we are subtracting.


(3y +  -1 + -4y + 2y^2 + -6 +
3y + 2y^2 + 3y)/((y-1)(2y+3)) now add like terms to
get


(4y^2 + 5y -
7)/((y-1)(2y+3))


So our answers
are


(a) 1/(b-a) + 1/(a+b) -
2b(a^2-b^2) = -4b/(a^2-b^2) =
4b/(b^2-a^2)


(b)
(3y-1)/(2y^2+y-3) - (2-y)/(y-1) - y/(1-y) = (4y^2 + 5y -
7)/((y-1)(2y+3))

Why did Ying-ying decide to get marrid to Clifford St. Clair just after she found out her husband had been killed in Amy Tan's The Joy Luck Club?

It seems
at first, in Amy Tan's The Joy Luck Club, that Ying-Ying decides to
marry Clifford St. Clair because she learns that her first husband has been killed. This
appears to be a rational answer, but the reader must also recall
that she knew she would marry Clifford before
he did (with her power to know the future), just as
she knew she would marry her first
husband.


Ying-Ying is a woman that comes from wealth and
power, but in marrying the first man who was chosen for her by her family, it might be
said that she lost her power—even her identity. While that time
seems particularly significant to her as a young woman, her losses
may have taken place when she fell into the water (off a boat) when she was four, and
almost drowned.


Separated from her family, Ying-Ying
witnesses a play about the Moon Lady, and is told (as is the entire audience) that for a
fee, she can have one wish...but no one hears her plea. We can
assume that Ying-Ying is physically found, but somehow, something deep inside her has
been lost: perhaps because of her sense that she is of no
consequence—that no one is there to save her when she falls, and that no one seems to
miss her during that first story. Is it any wonder, then, that she might feel she
matters very little to her first and second husbands—even though Clifford is a good
man?


When Ying-Ying realizes her first husband has left
her, she goes to live with her extended family, under extremely undesireable
circumstances. Ultimately, she tires of doing nothing, and with some money she has, she
buys nice clothes, gets a chic haircut, and takes a job. When she first meets Clifford,
she can tell what kind of man he is. He, however, has little knowledge of who
she really is. In fact, as Ying-Ying tells it, he only learns her
secrets when he becomes a ghost, ostensibly because all ghosts may know in death what
they could not know in life.


Clifford wants to marry
Ying-Ying, and he cares about her. He waits four years—until she is ready: and she is
ready when she learns of her first husband's death. However, she is never really
connected with Clifford: she goes along with him to America and
quietly makes a new life as his wife. In truth, perhaps she marries Clifford because of
the wish she had made to the Moon Lady that night when she was a lost child—"I wished to
be found." Maybe Ying-Ying thought that Clifford might "find" her, in seeing her as no
one else did, appreciating her and taking care of
her.


However, by the end of the story, to hear Ying-Ying
tell it, it seems that she believes she must find herself—the tiger
that once lived in her, and give that tiger to her child before Ying-Ying dies, so that
her daughter can be strong.

What is the importance of magnesium for plants?

Magnesium is a secondary nutrients, as calcium  and sulfur
and it is involved in production of chlorophyll, which is essential in the process of
photosynthesis. Without magnesium, the chlorophyll is not able to capture the sun's
light energy needed in photosynthesis process.


The plant's
roots absorb the mineral nutrients found in the soils they grow. If the amount of
nutrients present in soil is not enough, fertilizers can be helpful. Sandy soils are not
suited for keeping the nutrients within, while organic soils behave much
better.


Also, pay attention to the levels of pH from the
soil where the plant grows, since magnesium, which is a macronutrient, is less available
in acidic soils. Adding lime to these kind of soils, can reduce its
acidity.

Who invented chemistry ?

Chemistry is an ancient pursuit. At this point no one
person can be named as the inventor or discoverer of chemistry, but we can name some
specific landmark discoveries to get a sense of how long chemistry has been important to
humankind. One could make a case for chemistry as a practical art dating back to the
pigment formulation for cave paintings from 35,000 years
ago.


During the reign of Hammurabi in ancient Babylon,
around 1700 BCE, the known metals were being studied, and their properties were being
linked by astronomers to the heavenly bodies. This is the oldest example of formal
theoretical chemistry that we know of.


Almost 1300 years
later, in 430 BCE, the Greek philosopher Democritus put forth his theory that all matter
is made of tiny particles called atoms.

In what ways was New England Puritanism different from Anglicanism?

The Puritans believed the Anglican Church, led by the King
of England, had developed a hierarchy much like the Catholic Church they had separated
from originally.  So unlike Anglicanism, there were no Bishops and Archbishops, and no
dominating structure for the church in general.  Puritans wanted each congregation in
the various villages of Massachusetts to be self-sustaining and autonomous.  Puritans
feared extensive heirarchy would corrupt them as it had, in their view, the Catholic and
Anglican churches.


Puritans also believed in Calvinism
(teachings of John Calvin), that a person's fate in the afterlife had been
predetermined, and that only living as godly a life as possible would enable you to
receive the Grace of God and entry into the Kingdom of
Heaven.


Lastly, I would say there was much more extensive
social pressure and control among the small Puritan villages than there was in Anglican
dominated regions in Britain.  It was this fear of being ostracized or condemned by the
Puritan village that often defined their daily lives.

Wednesday, February 19, 2014

How do the boys feel about the island once they reach its summit and have toppled the rock?Chapter 1 of Lord of the Flies by William Golding

Having realized that they are free from the dominion of
adults, in Chapter One the boys are elated in what they perceive as their acquired
paradise: "Here was a coral island" (like the book about Victorian boys stranded on an
island).  As they ascend, Ralph gleefully stands upon his head; the others shot words of
exclamation and joy: "Wacco!" "Wizard!" and "Smashing!"  Then, they actually discover a
coral reef, and Ralph turns to the others, declaring, "This belongs to
us." 


After they reach the summit, the three boys, Ralph,
Jack, and Simon, feel a sense of fraternity:


readability="9">

Eyes shining, mouths open, triumphant, they
savoured the right of domination.  They were lifted up:  were
friends.



Their exploration is
interrupted by a childish desire to push off one of the pink granite rocks.  Jack is the
first to lean against it.  The others sway back and forth in rhythm.  One of them yells,
"Heave!" and


readability="12">

the great rock loitered...moved through the air,
fell, struck, turned over, leapt droning through the air and smashed a deep hole in the
canopy of the forest.  Echoes and birds few,...the forest shook as with the passage of
an enraged
monster....




The boys
again exclaim, "Wacco!"  "Like a bomg!"  "Whee--aa-oo!" in triumph.  Then, they look
from this vantage point to the platform where they see the "insect-like" forms of the
other boys.  Ralph declares, "All ours" as he spreads his arms.  Suddenly, they see the
pigs and Jack hesitates to kill one.  "Next time."  Jack vows that the next time he will
show the pig no mercy. He will not forget his public shame.

What is the meaning of The photograph of Harrison Bergeron on the screen jumped again and again in Harrison Bergeron?

Kurt Vonnegut's science fiction short story "Harrison
Bergeron" is set in the year 2081, a year in which everyone has been forcibly
equalized.  In order to ensure that its citizens remain equal, handicaps are compulsory
for those who have more talent, more athleticism, more
intelligence. 


A virtual superman, Harrison Bergeron is
seven feet tall.  He wears the heaviest handicaps of his society:  a red rubber ball for
a nose, a huge pair of earphones, spectacles with wavy lenses that not only prohibit his
sight, but also give him headaches.  Harrison looks "like a walking junkyard" with his
three hundred pounds of handicaps. So, when the seven-footer breaks out of prison
and then crashes into the television station where his photograph has been flashed upon
the screen from different angles, his weight with the handicaps is so heavy that the
photograph of him jumps "again and again as though dancing to the tune of an
earthquake." 


That Harrison causes the ground to shake is
evinced by Vonnegut's having written, 


readability="7">

George Bergeron correctly identified the
earthquake, and well he might have--for many was the time his own home had danced to the
same crashing tune.



Just
then, George's thought is cut off by the brain waves that he is sent so that he will not
be doing something that others cannot.

Write a critical review of Emerson's essay "SELF-RELIANCE"?

In his essay, "Self-Reliance:  Portable Property," B. L.
Packer states that


readability="5">

The essay as it stands is a kind of gigantic coda
to the work of Emerson's decade of
challenge.



Certainly, its
relevance is timeless, and it does reflect the Transcendental precept of the almost holy
worth of the individual;  also, it contains timeless moral lessons. Perhaps more than
ever, Americans should heed its warnings that individualism is essential to freedom as
Emerson's essay has been likened to the message from the New
Testament:


readability="7">

Matthew 16:26: For what is a man
profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own
soul?



For, the
tendency of many to rely more on government than on themselves is, indeed, destructive
to the sanctity of the individual, the "integrity of your own mind." In this day of
political correctness and fear for one's job, few are willing to do what Emerson
urges:  "Speak what you think now in hard words."  Still, Emerson's urgings are
sound; reform cannot be made unless people address what problems really are, unless
people speak freely in a society.


Ralph Waldo Emerson's
message in "Self-Reliance" is as profoundly relevant as ever--if not more so.  However,
his meanings are not divulged by definition, but by analogy, an method which makes
the comprehension of his essay more difficult for his readers as he issues.
Nevertheless, his commandment, "Whoso would be a man must be a nonconformist’’ permeates
his essay. 


 

What is the meaning of the 4th stanza of Eliot's Preludes, especially the lines "I am moved by fancies...Infinitely suffering thing".

A century old this year, T.S. Eliot's Preludes raises the curtain on his great modernist masterpieces, The Love...