Sunday, September 21, 2014

What are some possible meanings of "The Most Dangerous Game," an short story by Richard Edward Connell?

Several possible meanings can be (and have been) suggested
for Richard Edward Connell’s short story “The Most Dangerous Game.” The story describes
how two big-game hunters meet when the first (Sanger Rainsford), after having fallen off
a yacht, washes up on a remote island owned by the second (General Zaroff).  The latter
has become bored with hunting animals and thus instead hunts humans who, after mishaps
at sea, manage to make it to his island. Zaroff decides that Rainsford will be the next
object of such a hunt. After Zaroff gives Rainsford some rudimentary weapons and a head
start, the hunt begins. Ultimately, Rainsford manages not only to survive but to prove
victorious in his conflict with Zaroff, Zaroff’s assistant, and Zaroff’s dogs. At the
end of the story, Rainsford seems to have succeeded in killing Zaroff in the latter’s
own home. Among some suggested meanings of the story are the
following:


  • Zaroff’s sense of his own strength is
    his greatest weakness, according to an article on the story in Don D’Amasso’s
    Encyclopedia of Adventure Fiction (New York: Facts on File, 2009),
    p. 153.

  • According to the same article, Rainsford’s final
    victory may (or may not) suggest that “civilization has triumphed over barbarism” (p.
    153).

  • According to the same article, Rainsford is “forced
    to act as would any cornered prey” (p. 153).

  • According to
    the same article, the story is appealing first and foremost as a straightforward
    adventure story (p. 153).

  • According to the same article,

readability="10">

Zaroff is the iron fist in a velvet glove, a
savage hunter who wears the veneer of civilization as a convenience, only truly coming
to life when he is able to cast it aside and indulge in his favorite occupation, the
hunt and the kill.” (p.
153)



  • According to
    Alice Trupe’s Thematic Guide to Young Adult Literature, the story
    is one of the best-known examples of the theme of “survival” (Westport, CT: Greenwood,
    2006), p. 217.

  • According to Nancy Kress’s book
    Beginnings, Middles, and Ends (Cincinnati, OH: Writer’s Digest
    Books, 1999), the story is clearly structured in terms of all three components suggested
    by Kress’s title and thus shows the skill of Connell’s design (p.
    61).

  • According to an article by Gary Westfahl in
    The Greenwood Encyclopedia of Science Fiction and Fantasy: Themes, Works, and
    Wonders
    , ed. Gary Westfahl, 3 vols. (Westport, CT: Greenwood, 2005), the
    story exemplifies the theme of role-reversal (vol. 2, p.
    681).

  • According to an article in The A-Z
    Encyclopedia of Serial Killers
    , by Harold Schechter and David Everitt, 2nd
    edition (New York: Pocket Books, 2006), the story depicts “the hunting instinct gone
    mad” (p. 240).

  • For further suggested meanings, see the
    links below.

No comments:

Post a Comment

What is the meaning of the 4th stanza of Eliot's Preludes, especially the lines "I am moved by fancies...Infinitely suffering thing".

A century old this year, T.S. Eliot's Preludes raises the curtain on his great modernist masterpieces, The Love...