Saturday, January 11, 2014

How does Aristotle view of artistic "Mimesis" contradict Plato's negative view of art?Explain in detail.plz answer in detail

The view that art is mimetic was a concept long
established among the Greeks. But Plato was first to compile the idea into a concise
theory - the central point of it being that art being mimetic, and the art d' objects
being imitation of form that was twice removed from the ideal form, the artistic
practices or art forms are harmful for society. Plato would therefore not want to
include poets, dramatists, painters etc. in his ideal Republic
state.


By using the word 'mimesis' in his 'Poetics'
Aristotle accepts that art is imitation, but that is exactly how far his view on mimesis
agrees with Plato's views on mimesis. According to Aristotle, in imitating reality, art
learns about the real nature and form of Nature and thus art leads to knowledge and is
therefore positive for society. According to Aristotle, knowledge of reality and Nature,
enables art to express what should be the ideal form and which may not really always be
in Nature but which Nature tries to attain. Thus mimesis enables even Nature to be
transcended through artistic endevour. The knowledge that art is imitation of reality
leads to understanding of the true form in Nature and gives rise to feelings of pleasure
and another mode of cathersis.

No comments:

Post a Comment

What is the meaning of the 4th stanza of Eliot's Preludes, especially the lines "I am moved by fancies...Infinitely suffering thing".

A century old this year, T.S. Eliot's Preludes raises the curtain on his great modernist masterpieces, The Love...