Zaroff and Rainsford, the main characters in "The Most
Dangerous Game," share a passion for hunting. Rainsford is an expert in the field,
having written many books on the subject, books which Zaroff has actually read,
ironically enough. Rainsford considers it a sport which humans are more or less
entitled to because of their superiority to animals, who he perceives don't really
notice or feel anything when they are being hunted (a philosophy which changes fairly
quickly when he becomes the hunted one). Zaroff is a cold, calculating killer, despite
what he might say, and he conceives the idea of hunting human beings as being more
challenging to himself, as well as being perfectly OK since he hunts people that he
considers to be socially inferior.
Monday, January 27, 2014
Zaroff states, "I'm a hunter, not a murderer." How does this fit in with Rainsford's hunting philosophy in The Most Dangerous Game?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
What is the meaning of the 4th stanza of Eliot's Preludes, especially the lines "I am moved by fancies...Infinitely suffering thing".
A century old this year, T.S. Eliot's Preludes raises the curtain on his great modernist masterpieces, The Love...
-
Reading the story carefully reveals the answer to your question. After the narrator had become possessed by "the fury of a ...
-
A helpful discussion of the plot structure of Oedipus Rex , which includes a useful chart, can be found here: ...
-
I think that one of the fundamental tenets of postcolonialism calls for a reevaluation of previously held beliefs and ideas. Fo...
No comments:
Post a Comment