Compare and contrast Christopher Marlowe's play Doctor Faustus with the medieval morality play Everyman. How is Marlowe's doctor more complex?

The title character in Christopher Marlowe’s play
Doctor Faustus is more complex than the title character in the
medieval morality play Everyman in a number of ways, including the
following:

• Faustus is very well educated,
  whereas Everyman apparently is not.  Faustus’s education makes his involvement with the
  devil even more blameworthy than Everyman’s sins.  Faustus’s education should have made
  him know better than to sell his soul to Satan.


• In
  particular, Faustus has studied theology, whereas Everyman’s knowledge of the teachings
  of the church seems to be quite rudimentary.


• Faustus
  actively chooses to consort with evil and to embrace it, whereas Everyman seems (at
  first) largely ignorant of his shortcomings.


• Faustus
  actively chooses evil, whereas Everyman’s main failing seems to be an insufficient
  number of good deeds.


• Faustus is warned by Mephastophilis
  about the dangers of selling his soul to Satan, but he chooses to ignore such warnings. 
  Everyman, in contrast, responds almost immediately and positively to the teachings he
  receives, from Death as well as from other characters.


• At
  the end of Doctor Faustus, the title character cannot seem to
  decide how to behave.  He feels tempted to ask for God’s help but never really does. He
  is extremely conflicted.  In contrast, by the end of Everyman the
  title character has fully embraced his good deeds and walks into the grave with her
  without hesitation and indeed with real anticipation and joy. Everyman has learned his
  lessons well; Doctor Faustus, in contrast, never expresses genuine or deep regret for
  the evil he has chosen.


• Ironically, Doctor Faustus is the
  more complex of the two characters (especially intellectually), but in some ways he is
  also the more obviously foolish and stupid.