How does Romantic writing differ from the early American writings done by the Puritans?

Both types of writing reflect the culture and beliefs of
their era.

Writing of the Puritans particularly captures
the lifestyle of a people bound to the conditions of a strict religious view with little
room for grace or forgiveness. They focused on education, and founded Harvard University
among others. Their literature reflects this in that the language demonstrates
complicated (but correct) sentence structures as well as great variety in vocabulary. I
think it is also important not to confuse writings about Puritans
(The Scarlet Letter, The Crucible) with writings
by Puritans.

Anne Bradstreet's
writings reflect someone feeling trapped by a society's pressure to perform or be
perfect. Jonathan Edwards' sermons reflect great pressure to come to Christ. Each of
their writings use literary devices to express their points. The
development of these are usually in the form of a more complicated extended metaphor or
allegorical symbol. We see this in the hand of God in Edwards' "Sinners
in the Hands of an Angry God" and in Bradstreet's "The Author to Her Book" in which
Bradstreet likens her writing to that of raising a
child.

In the Romantic era, we see something much
different. In essence, Puritans wrote about what was real to them;
Romantics began to express themselves through their
imagination. A wide variety of authors are considered to be Romantic.
Mary Shelley for example wrote Frankenstein which was a great
expression of what the human mind was capable of imagining at the time. Jane Austen and
the Bronte sisters were also considered Romantics. They often wrote about relationships
which contained exaggerated situational circumstances.