Thursday, June 11, 2015

Did the American colonial economy benefit or suffer from the British mercantilist colonial system?

The colonies managed to prosper while Britain's
mercantilistic policies were in force, but did so in spite of the policy rather than
because of it. They violated British policy with abandon and thereby managed to prosper;
otherwise they would have suffered severely.


Mercantilism
was intended to provide a favorable balance of trade between the mother country and the
colonies. British economists envisioned that the colonies would be a source of raw
materials for Britain and also a market for manufactured goods. As a result the several
Navigation Acts were passed which prohibited the colonies from trading with other
countries or shipping on any ships other than those sailing the British flag. The
Navigation Act of 1651 had been aimed at the Dutch who were England's rivals for the
Atlantic trade. The problem for the colonists was that strict enforcement of the policy
would result in an unfavorable balance of trade for them and a scarcity of hard money.
The colonists ignored the law and conducted a lively and thriving trade with the Dutch
and other countries. Among those who became quite wealthy from smuggling was John
Hancock, of the famous signature. Several other Navigation Acts were subsequently
passed, including the Staple Act and the Plantations Act which required all goods be
landed in England and a duty paid before they could be shipped elsewhere. This Act,
however, came in force during the English Civil War and the Protectorate when turmoil at
home prevented the British from enforcing the
policy.


Ultimately, customs agents were sent to the
colonies to enforce the Acts, but they caused bitter resentment. The continued abuse of
the Navigation Acts led to the cancellation of the Charter of the Massachusetts Bay
Company. Subsequent attempts to enforce the acts came to naught, as colonial juries
uniformly refused to find smugglers guilty.


Ultimately,
with the ascension of George I and II to the throne, Parliament began a policy which
Edmund Burke called "a wise and salutary neglect." British officials were busy
protecting their own interests and the colonies were largely ignored. So the colonists
prospered under mercantilism, but only because of their continuous and wilful violation
of the policy.

No comments:

Post a Comment

What is the meaning of the 4th stanza of Eliot's Preludes, especially the lines "I am moved by fancies...Infinitely suffering thing".

A century old this year, T.S. Eliot's Preludes raises the curtain on his great modernist masterpieces, The Love...