Tuesday, December 9, 2014

In "Harrison Bergeron," is Harrison a round or flat character?

I would want to argue that he is definitely a flat
character. Let us remember the central distinction between these two terms. A round
character is one that is fully developed so that we are able to appreciate the
psychological complexity of this character. A flat character is a character that has
just one or two central characteristics and is therefore never really
developed.


Harrison seems to have one characteristic and to
perform one central action in the story. He is incredibly intelligent, able and
handsome. His one act of rebellion is to challenge the basis of this dystopian society,
that is based on achieving perfect equality, by showing his brilliance through declaring
himself Emperor and taking an Empress, then dancing so that the world is forced to look
at and admire their skill and beauty. Note what he says in his act of
defiance:


readability="9">

"Even as I stand here--" he bellowed, "crippled,
hobbled, sickened--I am a greater ruler than any man who ever lived! Now watch me become
what I can
become!"



He
deliberately draws attention to his own greatness and what he is capable of being.
However, that is it. We know nothing more than that. He is a character that seems to be
peculiarly limited for one who is so brilliant. Therefore, because he lacks
psychological complexity, we can say that he is a flat
character.

No comments:

Post a Comment

What is the meaning of the 4th stanza of Eliot's Preludes, especially the lines "I am moved by fancies...Infinitely suffering thing".

A century old this year, T.S. Eliot's Preludes raises the curtain on his great modernist masterpieces, The Love...