Sunday, December 1, 2013

What evidence can you find in the story that the author might have intended to make Jem's broken arm symbolic in To Kill a Mockingbird?Readers...

It is indeed curious that there are two arms
disabled--both left arms--in Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird,
one white, one black.  And, since injustice has been dealt to Tom Robinson, the
perpetrator of this injustice, Bob Ewell, is also the agent of the injury inflicted upon
the son of the lawyer for justice, Atticus Finch.


It is,
perhaps, because this virulent disease, what Atticus has called in Chapter 9 "Maycomb's
usual disease," has not been arrested that Bob Ewell feels empowered in his hatred to
avenge himself upon the Finch family.  For, smug after Atticus's loss in the Robinson
trial, Ewell spits in the lawyer's face and boasts of getting even with Atticus Finch.
Atticus's "peaceful reaction" prompts Ewell to taunt him, "Too proud to fight, you
n--lovin' bastard?"  Thus emboldened by Atticus's lack of response, Bob Ewell decides to
attack his children, symbolic of the innocent.  Thus, his cruel injurying of Jem
represents the gratuitous injury to all of society when bias and prejudice reign over
reason and fairness, the wound inflicted upon Southern society

No comments:

Post a Comment

What is the meaning of the 4th stanza of Eliot's Preludes, especially the lines "I am moved by fancies...Infinitely suffering thing".

A century old this year, T.S. Eliot's Preludes raises the curtain on his great modernist masterpieces, The Love...