Sunday, December 1, 2013

What are the implications of classifying people according to "race"?

Classifying people according to race is inherently
problematic because race is a socially constructed idea.  There are as many genetic
differences within people of a given "race" as there are between the different "races." 
Therefore, race is not a good criterion by which to classify
people.


Classifying people by race can have a number of
important implications:


  • It encourages us to
    identify ourselves based on physical characteristics rather than on cultural attitudes
    or other attributes.  I, for example, am half Asian and half "white."  I am culturally
    more "white" than Asian, but I tend to be identified as Asian because of my physical
    looks.

  • It discourages people from classifying themselves
    according to other characteristics that (to some) are more important.  For example,
    people tend to focus on race instead of looking at things like socioeconomic status or
    "class."  Arguably, these latter two criteria are more important than one's looks, but
    we focus on the physical because we are so caught up in issues of
    race.

  • Finally, it can set up false ideas about which
    peoples are similar.  For example, it can make us think that a Dominican is essentially
    like an African American because they are both "black."  The same is true of recent
    immigrants from Africa and African Americans whose ancestors have been here for 400
    years.

All of these are serious implications
of our tendency to see race as the most important criterion for classifying
people.

No comments:

Post a Comment

What is the meaning of the 4th stanza of Eliot's Preludes, especially the lines "I am moved by fancies...Infinitely suffering thing".

A century old this year, T.S. Eliot's Preludes raises the curtain on his great modernist masterpieces, The Love...