One of the things that made Richard Nixon's presidency and
foreign policy unique is that he was so effective at both engaging the Soviets with
aggressive military action and policies, while reaching out with the other hand and
negotiating. Prior to Nixon, other Cold War presidents had mainly pursued a policy of
containment using deterrence, massive military spending, a fearsome and expanding,
advancing nuclear arsenal, and military alliances with clear anti-Soviet postures. They
also pursued these policies both towards the Soviets AND Communist China, whereas Nixon
realized a different approach might be more effective. His policy of detente, including
visiting China and meeting with Chairman Mao, driving a wedge between the USSR and them,
then negotiating for a nuclear arms freeze, was both brilliant and effective. He was
criticized at the time as though engagement was showing some kind of weakness, and
certainly the Watergate scandal will always overshadow such moments of brilliance, but
historically, they can't be denied. Henry Kissinger, his National Security Advisor, was
an able right hand in those negotiations.
Saturday, March 22, 2014
Compare Nixon’s policies of engagement with foreign policy strategies used by other presidents during the Cold War.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
What is the meaning of the 4th stanza of Eliot's Preludes, especially the lines "I am moved by fancies...Infinitely suffering thing".
A century old this year, T.S. Eliot's Preludes raises the curtain on his great modernist masterpieces, The Love...
-
Reading the story carefully reveals the answer to your question. After the narrator had become possessed by "the fury of a ...
-
A helpful discussion of the plot structure of Oedipus Rex , which includes a useful chart, can be found here: ...
-
I think that one of the fundamental tenets of postcolonialism calls for a reevaluation of previously held beliefs and ideas. Fo...
No comments:
Post a Comment