Sunday, August 11, 2013

How does Chekhov’s presentation of the characters of Smirnov and Mrs. Popov make their reversal of feeling seem normal and logical, although...

One way to be able to understand the style of Anton
Chekov's one-act comedy The Bear is by analyzing it as what it is:
A vaudeville-type farce that is written with the purpose of providing the audience a
quick and surprising piece of theatrical
entertainment.


This being said, it is expected from a
dramatist of this kind to create characters that are not too prone to be analyzed
in-depth. Any depth of character, or any depth in the plot itself would compromise the
style and purpose of this kind of theatrical
work.


Therefore, what Chekov does is to introduce two
characters who have a problem in common: The death of Mrs. Popov's husband. However, we
know little about their past, present, or future. What we do know is that the problem at
hand is that Smirnof wants his money and Popov does not have it. The farcical part of
the play comes when we realize that Smirnof dislikes women and talks bad about them
whereas Popov is over-dramatic and is reacting in an exaggerated manner towards her
husband's death.


These odd behaviors and their current
problem is all that the audience has to determine whether Popov and Smirnof are a)
crazy,  b) silly,  c) eccentric, or d) all of the above. Since it seems that they are,
in fact, quite eccentric and silly it is no surprise that the ending will turn out to be
as weird as the characters that lead it. Smirnof ends up proposing to Popov even after
the two had prepared to duel to their deaths, and- like in many short and funny movies
and stories- all the insanity seems to magically end with a
kiss.

No comments:

Post a Comment

What is the meaning of the 4th stanza of Eliot's Preludes, especially the lines "I am moved by fancies...Infinitely suffering thing".

A century old this year, T.S. Eliot's Preludes raises the curtain on his great modernist masterpieces, The Love...